• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identification of Maxillofacial Problems in Extraoral Photographs by Panel Members: A Pilot Study.小组成员通过口外照片识别颌面部问题:一项初步研究。
Turk J Orthod. 2019 Mar;32(1):41-46. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18033. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
2
Do the Most Attractive Faces of Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Differ From Those With the Least Attractive Faces in Terms of Angular and Proportional Measurements Assessed on Frontal and Lateral Photographs?在根据正面和侧面照片评估的角度和比例测量方面,安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合患者中最具吸引力的面部与最不具吸引力的面部是否存在差异?
Cureus. 2023 Jan 6;15(1):e33455. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33455. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
[The effect of orthodontic treatment on facial profile of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusions].[正畸治疗对安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合患者面部轮廓的影响]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012 Feb;21(1):88-93.
4
Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.青少年正畸治疗后面部美学变化的小组认知
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):141-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm114. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
5
Esthetic evaluation of profile photographs showing various sagittal and vertical patterns.展示各种矢状和垂直模式的侧貌照片的美学评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Mar;159(3):281-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.027. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
6
A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.普通公众与三组临床医生对面部轮廓感知的比较。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999;14(4):291-5.
7
The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.年轻西班牙人群对面部美学的认知。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):335-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr014. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
8
Investigation of the Relationship between Sagittal Skeletal Nasal Profile Morphology and Malocclusions: A Lateral Cephalometric Film Study.矢状面鼻骨轮廓形态与错牙合畸形关系的研究:一项头颅侧位片研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 27;13(3):463. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030463.
9
Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.不同骨骼类型中的面部凸度角
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Dec;29(6):648-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm073. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
10
Golden proportions as predictors of attractiveness and malocclusion.黄金比例作为吸引力和错颌畸形的预测指标。
Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Nov-Dec;25(6):788-93. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.152206.

本文引用的文献

1
Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.青少年正畸治疗后面部美学变化的小组认知
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):141-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm114. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
2
Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. A subjective and objective evaluation.中国患者正颌外科手术的结果。主观和客观评价。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Sep;77(5):845-50. doi: 10.2319/091906-378.
3
Smile attractiveness. Self-perception and influence on personality.微笑吸引力。自我认知及其对个性的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Sep;77(5):759-65. doi: 10.2319/082606-349.
4
Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces.专家组构成对青少年面部美学评价的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Feb;29(1):95-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl060.
5
Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces.有吸引力和无吸引力面孔的颅面形态。
Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):204-10. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0204:SMOAAN]2.0.CO;2.
6
Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.微笑美学:治疗前后微笑的感知与比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jan;129(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.004.
7
The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness.人体测量比例指数在面部吸引力测量中的应用。
Eur J Orthod. 2006 Jun;28(3):274-81. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji098. Epub 2006 Jan 13.
8
Buccal corridors and smile esthetics.颊侧间隙与微笑美学
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Feb;127(2):208-13; quiz 261. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.027.
9
Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar class II cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery.面部美学认知:对采用生长改良尝试或后期正颌手术治疗的相似II类病例的比较
Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):365-73. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0365:POFEAC>2.0.CO;2.
10
Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery.面部吸引力评分与正颌手术患者动机之间的关联。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003 Feb;6(1):63-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0280.2003.2c097.x.

小组成员通过口外照片识别颌面部问题:一项初步研究。

Identification of Maxillofacial Problems in Extraoral Photographs by Panel Members: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Kılıçaslan Yağmur, Erhamza Türkan Sezen, Özdiler Ferabi Erhan

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Kırıkkale University School of Dentistry, Kırıkkale, Turkey.

Department of Orthodontics, Ankara University School of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2019 Mar;32(1):41-46. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18033. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

DOI:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18033
PMID:30944899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6436912/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the profile and frontal photographs in determining sagittal maxillofacial problems by the panel members created from different professional groups.

METHODS

Frontal and profile photographs of four individuals with skeletal Class I, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion were assessed by panel members. A total of 42 panel members from 7 different professions participated in the study. Panel members were asked to choose one of the frontal or profile photographs to be used in determining the maxillofacial problem. Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Fisher's exact test were applied to evaluate the difference between the panelists.

RESULTS

Of the 42 panel members, 16% selected frontal photographs, and 84% selected profile photographs. There were no statistically significant differences between seven panels with regard to photography selection (p>0.05). When all panel members were compared with regard to gender, 17.9% of the frontal photographs and 82.1% of the profile photographs were selected by females, whereas 15.4% of the frontal photographs and 84.6% of the profile photographs were chosen by males. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

It was found that the profile photograph was more preferred and informative in determining the sagittal maxillofacial problem.

摘要

目的

本初步研究的目的是评估由不同专业群体组成的评审小组通过侧面和正面照片确定矢状面颌面部问题的有效性。

方法

评审小组成员对4名分别患有骨骼I类、II类1分类、II类2分类和III类错牙合畸形的个体的正面和侧面照片进行评估。共有来自7个不同专业的42名评审小组成员参与了该研究。要求评审小组成员选择一张正面或侧面照片用于确定颌面部问题。采用曼-惠特尼U检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和费舍尔精确检验来评估小组成员之间的差异。

结果

在42名评审小组成员中,16%选择了正面照片,84%选择了侧面照片。七个小组在照片选择方面无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。当比较所有评审小组成员的性别时,女性选择了17.9%的正面照片和82.1%的侧面照片,而男性选择了15.4%的正面照片和84.6%的侧面照片。男性和女性之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

发现在确定矢状面颌面部问题时,侧面照片更受青睐且信息量更大。