Townsend R, Cringle S J, Morgan W H, Chauhan B C, Yu D-Y
Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth, Australia.
Exp Eye Res. 2006 Jan;82(1):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
The aim of this study was to improve our ability to interpret and validate Heidelberg Retina Flowmeter (HRF) flow images by recording flow measurements from specific regions of the retinal vasculature by taking advantage of the ability to precisely regulate perfusion flow in an isolated eye preparation. The retinal vasculature in 16 isolated perfused pig eyes was perfused with a 50%/50% Krebs/RBC solution at known flow rates ranging from 0 to 300 microl min(-1). At each flow rate, HRF images were obtained at a location approximately two disc diameters from the disc. After HRF image acquisition, the retinal vasculature was perfused with fluorescein isothiocyanate for fluorescence microscopy. Using the standard HRF software and a 10 x 10pixel measurement window, flow rates were measured from a retinal artery, vein, arteriole, venule, and the retinal capillary bed and a capillary-free-zone. The relationship between HRF measured flow and perfusion flow in the different measurement locations was determined. At zero perfusion flow the measured HRF flow was consistently greater than zero ( approximately 170 arbitrary units (AU)), and not significantly different at each measurement location except for the retinal vein, which had a significantly higher HRF flow value ( approximately 230AU). At higher perfusion flow rates the flow signal from the larger vascular elements (arteries and veins) increased rapidly thereafter to reach several thousand AU at a total perfusate flow of 50 microlmin(-1) and increased less rapidly at higher flow rates. In arterioles, the HRF flow was more linear over a broader range of perfusate flow rates but the peak flow signal was an order of magnitude smaller than that from the retinal artery. Both the linearity and magnitude of the flow signal in venules was less than that in arterioles. In capillary areas and in the capillary free zone, the HRF flow showed only a very weak relationship to perfusion flow when compared to the background noise. The choice of location for HRF flow analysis greatly influences the ability of the technique to measure changes in retinal blood flow. The major arteries and veins provide the strongest signal and greatest signal to noise ratio. However, the retinal arterioles produce an HRF signal that is more linear over a wider range of perfusate flow rates.
本研究的目的是通过利用在离体眼制备中精确调节灌注流量的能力,记录视网膜血管特定区域的流量测量值,来提高我们解释和验证海德堡视网膜血流计(HRF)血流图像的能力。对16只离体灌注猪眼的视网膜血管用50%/50%的 Krebs/RBC 溶液以0至300微升/分钟(-1)的已知流速进行灌注。在每个流速下,在距视盘约两个视盘直径的位置获取HRF图像。在获取HRF图像后,用异硫氰酸荧光素灌注视网膜血管用于荧光显微镜检查。使用标准的HRF软件和10×10像素的测量窗口,从视网膜动脉、静脉、小动脉、小静脉、视网膜毛细血管床和无毛细血管区测量流速。确定了不同测量位置的HRF测量流量与灌注流量之间的关系。在零灌注流量时,测得的HRF流量始终大于零(约170任意单位(AU)),除视网膜静脉的HRF流量值明显较高(约230AU)外,各测量位置之间无显著差异。在较高的灌注流速下,较大血管成分(动脉和静脉)的流量信号此后迅速增加,在总灌注液流速为50微升/分钟(-1)时达到数千AU,在更高流速下增加较慢。在小动脉中,HRF流量在更宽的灌注液流速范围内更呈线性,但峰值流量信号比视网膜动脉小一个数量级。小静脉中流量信号的线性度和幅度均小于小动脉。与背景噪声相比,在毛细血管区域和无毛细血管区,HRF流量与灌注流量的关系非常弱。HRF流量分析位置的选择极大地影响了该技术测量视网膜血流变化的能力。主要动脉和静脉提供最强的信号和最大的信噪比。然而,视网膜小动脉产生的HRF信号在更宽的灌注液流速范围内更呈线性。