Cornet Ronald, Abu-Hanna Ameen
Academic Medical Center, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Artif Intell Med. 2005 Jul;34(3):201-17. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2005.01.003.
Medical terminological systems (TSs) play an increasingly important role in health care by supporting recording, retrieval and analysis of patient information. As the size and complexity of TSs are growing, the need arises for means to audit them, i.e. verify and maintain (logical) consistency and (semantic) correctness of their contents. This is not only important for the management of TSs but also for providing their users with confidence about the reliability of their contents. Formal methods have the potential to play an important role in the audit of TSs, although there are few empirical studies to assess the benefits of using these methods.
In this paper we propose a method based on description logics (DLs) for the audit of TSs. This method is based on the migration of the medical TS from a frame-based representation to a DL-based one. Our method is characterized by a process in which initially stringent assumptions are made about concept definitions. The assumptions allow the detection of concepts and relations that might comprise a source of logical inconsistency. If the assumptions hold then definitions are to be altered to eliminate the inconsistency, otherwise the assumptions are revised.
In order to demonstrate the utility of the approach in a real-world case study we audit a TS in the intensive care domain and discuss decisions pertaining to building DL-based representations. This case study demonstrates that certain types of inconsistencies can indeed be detected by applying the method to a medical terminological system.
The added value of the method described in this paper is that it provides a means to evaluate the compliance to a number of common modeling principles in a formal manner. The proposed method reveals potential modeling inconsistencies, helping to audit and (if possible) improve the medical TS. In this way, it contributes to providing confidence in the contents of the terminological system.
医学术语系统(TSs)通过支持患者信息的记录、检索和分析,在医疗保健中发挥着越来越重要的作用。随着TSs的规模和复杂性不断增加,需要对其进行审核的手段,即验证并维护其内容的(逻辑)一致性和(语义)正确性。这不仅对TSs的管理很重要,而且对于让其用户相信其内容的可靠性也很重要。形式化方法有潜力在TSs的审核中发挥重要作用,尽管很少有实证研究来评估使用这些方法的益处。
在本文中,我们提出一种基于描述逻辑(DLs)的TSs审核方法。该方法基于将医学TS从基于框架的表示迁移到基于DL的表示。我们的方法的特点是一个过程,其中最初对概念定义做出严格假设。这些假设允许检测可能构成逻辑不一致来源的概念和关系。如果假设成立,则修改定义以消除不一致,否则修改假设。
为了在实际案例研究中证明该方法的实用性,我们审核了重症监护领域的一个TS,并讨论了与构建基于DL的表示相关的决策。该案例研究表明,通过将该方法应用于医学术语系统,确实可以检测到某些类型的不一致。
本文所述方法的附加值在于,它提供了一种以形式化方式评估对一些常见建模原则的遵守情况的手段。所提出的方法揭示了潜在的建模不一致,有助于审核并(如果可能)改进医学TS。通过这种方式,它有助于增强对术语系统内容的信心。