Grothues Janina, Bischof Gallus, Reinhardt Susa, Hapke Ulfert, Meyer Christian, John Ulrich, Rumpf Hans-Jürgen
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2005 Sep-Oct;40(5):394-400. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh182. Epub 2005 Jul 4.
This paper examines the interaction of intention to change drinking behaviour with comorbid depression and anxiety in pro-actively recruited individuals with a range of drinking problems.
Cross-sectional data of 408 general practice (GP) patients aged 18-64 years, who meet the diagnostic criteria of alcohol dependence or abuse according to DSM-IV, criteria of at-risk drinking or binge drinking, were drawn from a brief intervention study. Of the sample, 89 participants were diagnosed with comorbid anxiety and/or depressive disorders. The Transtheoretical Model (TTM) of behaviour change constructs: stages and processes of change, self-efficacy, and decisional balance were assessed in relation to presence and absence of the respective psychiatric disorders.
Analysis including all categories of problematic drinking revealed comorbid anxiety and/or depression to be significantly related to later stages of change. Within subgroups, this was only true for alcohol abuse, not for dependence, at-risk or binge drinking. In addition, comorbidity was related to higher use of processes of change and more pros and cons of drinking, when compared to non-comorbid participants. Comorbid individuals showed higher temptation to drink and lower self-efficacy to abstain from drinking. Separate analyses of readiness to change drinking between the categories anxiety/no comorbidity and depression/no comorbidity both obtained significance, while for anxiety disorders, this was more profound. A multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that adverse consequences better predicted readiness to change when compared to comorbidity.
Individuals with problematic drinking and comorbid anxiety or depression may be well accessible for pro-active intervention to reduce drinking. Strategies should focus on the enhancement of coping skills to control temptation and self-efficacy.
本文研究了在主动招募的有一系列饮酒问题的个体中,改变饮酒行为的意图与共病抑郁和焦虑之间的相互作用。
从一项简短干预研究中提取了408名年龄在18 - 64岁的全科医生(GP)患者的横断面数据,这些患者符合DSM - IV中酒精依赖或滥用、危险饮酒或暴饮的诊断标准。在样本中,89名参与者被诊断患有共病焦虑和/或抑郁障碍。行为改变的跨理论模型(TTM)的构建要素:改变的阶段和过程、自我效能感以及决策平衡,根据是否存在相应的精神障碍进行了评估。
对所有问题饮酒类别进行的分析显示,共病焦虑和/或抑郁与改变的后期阶段显著相关。在亚组中,这仅适用于酒精滥用,不适用于依赖、危险饮酒或暴饮。此外,与无共病的参与者相比,共病与更多地使用改变过程以及饮酒的更多利弊相关。共病个体表现出更高的饮酒诱惑和更低的戒酒自我效能感。对焦虑/无共病和抑郁/无共病类别之间改变饮酒意愿的单独分析均具有显著性,而对于焦虑障碍,这种显著性更为明显。多项逻辑回归分析显示,与共病相比,不良后果能更好地预测改变的意愿。
有问题饮酒且共病焦虑或抑郁的个体可能很适合进行主动干预以减少饮酒。策略应侧重于增强应对技能以控制诱惑和自我效能感。