Satre Derek D, Leibowitz Amy, Sterling Stacy A, Lu Yun, Travis Adam, Weisner Constance
Department of Psychiatry, University of California.
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jul;84(7):571-9. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000096. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
This study examined the efficacy of Motivational Interviewing (MI) to reduce hazardous drinking and drug use among adults in treatment for depression.
Randomized controlled trial based in a large outpatient psychiatry program in an integrated health care system in Northern California. The sample consisted of 307 participants ages 18 and over who reported hazardous drinking, drug use (primarily cannabis) or misuse of prescription drugs in the prior 30 days, and who scored ≥5 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Participants were randomized to receive either 3 sessions of MI (1 in person and 2 by phone) or printed literature about alcohol and drug use risks (control), as an adjunct to usual outpatient depression care. Measures included alcohol and drug use in the prior 30 days and PHQ-9 depression symptoms. Participants completed baseline in-person interviews and telephone follow-up interviews at 3 and 6 months (96 and 98% of the baseline sample, respectively). Electronic health records were used to measure usual care.
At 6 months, MI was more effective than control in reducing rate of cannabis use (p = .037); and hazardous drinking (≥4 drinks in a day for women, ≥5 drinks in a day for men; p = .060). In logistic regression, assignment to MI predicted lower cannabis use at 6 months (p = .016) after controlling for covariates. Depression improved in both conditions.
MI can be an effective intervention for cannabis use and hazardous drinking among patients with depression. (PsycINFO Database Record
本研究考察了动机性访谈(MI)在减少抑郁症成年患者危险饮酒及药物使用方面的疗效。
在北加利福尼亚一个综合医疗系统的大型门诊精神病项目中进行随机对照试验。样本包括307名18岁及以上的参与者,他们在过去30天内报告有危险饮酒、药物使用(主要是大麻)或处方药滥用情况,且在患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)上得分≥5。参与者被随机分配接受3次动机性访谈(1次面对面访谈和2次电话访谈)或关于酒精和药物使用风险的印刷资料(对照组),作为常规门诊抑郁症护理的辅助措施。测量指标包括过去30天内的酒精和药物使用情况以及PHQ - 9抑郁症状。参与者在基线时进行面对面访谈,并在3个月和6个月时进行电话随访访谈(分别占基线样本的96%和98%)。使用电子健康记录来衡量常规护理情况。
在6个月时,动机性访谈在降低大麻使用率(p = .037)和危险饮酒率(女性每天≥4杯,男性每天≥5杯;p = .060)方面比对照组更有效。在逻辑回归分析中,在控制协变量后,分配到动机性访谈组的参与者在6个月时大麻使用率较低(p = .016)。两种情况下抑郁症状均有所改善。
动机性访谈对于抑郁症患者的大麻使用和危险饮酒可能是一种有效的干预措施。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )