Foster Dawn W, Neighbors Clayton
OA Alcohol. 2013 May 1;1(1):7. doi: 10.13172/2053-0285-1-1-575.
This paper provides a review of decisional balance (DB) and proposes strategies for improving DB measurement with respect to alcohol interventions for college students. Although existing alcohol interventions for college drinking are widely available, many undergraduates do not perceive any need to change their drinking. Intervention strategies that encourage students to consciously consider reasons for changing problem behaviors and resolve ambivalence may provide unique benefit. The DB and alcohol literature suggest; 1) a relationship exists between DB and motivation to change (MTC); 2) the decisional balance proportion (DBP) represents a promising new way to conceptualize MTC; and 3) while the DBP is a step forward in DB measurement, it can be improved. Alternative strategies proposed for improving the DBP include; 1) a weighted DBP, which may increase predictive ability and provide a closer approximation of an individual's MTC compared to the original DBP; 2) a coded DBP, which may allow for identification of common reasons why college students choose to drink or not drink; and 3) personalized DBP feedback, which may increase intervention efficacy by further highlighting the discrepancy between behaviors and goals. These strategies can be applied separately or in conjunction, and represent a potentially promising new avenue for DB research.
本文对决策平衡(DB)进行了综述,并提出了在针对大学生的酒精干预方面改进DB测量的策略。尽管现有的针对大学生饮酒问题的酒精干预措施广泛可得,但许多本科生并未意识到有改变饮酒行为的必要。鼓励学生有意识地思考改变问题行为的原因并解决矛盾心理的干预策略可能会带来独特的益处。DB与酒精相关文献表明:1)DB与改变动机(MTC)之间存在关联;2)决策平衡比例(DBP)是一种很有前景的将MTC概念化的新方法;3)虽然DBP在DB测量方面是一个进步,但仍可改进。为改进DBP提出的替代策略包括:1)加权DBP,与原始DBP相比,它可能会提高预测能力,并更接近个体的MTC;2)编码DBP,它可能有助于识别大学生选择饮酒或不饮酒的常见原因;3)个性化DBP反馈,它可能通过进一步突出行为与目标之间的差异来提高干预效果。这些策略可以单独应用或结合使用,代表了DB研究一个潜在的有前景的新途径。