Suppr超能文献

[游离结晶二氧化硅:总粉尘中其测定方法的比较]

[Free crystalline silica: a comparison of methods for its determination in total dust].

作者信息

Maciejewska Aleksandra, Szadkowska-Stańczyk Irena, Kondratowicz Grzegorz

机构信息

Z Zakładu Srodowiskowych Zagrozeń Zdrowia, Instytutu Medycyny Pracy im. J. Nofera w Lodzi.

出版信息

Med Pr. 2005;56(1):1-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The major objective of the study was to compare and investigate the usefulness of quantitative analyses of free crystalline silica (FCS) in the assessment of dust exposure in samples of total dust of varied composition, using three methods: chemical method in common use in Poland; infrared spectrometry; and x-ray powder diffraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mineral composition and FCS contents were investigated in 9 laboratory samples of raw materials, materials, and industrial wastes, containing from about 2 to over 80% of crystalline silica and reduced to particles of size corresponding with that of total dust. Sample components were identified using XRD and FT-IR methods. Ten independent determinations of FCS with each of the three study methods were performed in dust samples. An analysis of linear correlation was applied to investigate interrelationship between mean FCS determinations.

RESULTS

In analyzed dust samples, along with silica dust there were numerous minerals interfering with silica during the quantitative analysis. Comparison of mean results of FCS determinations showed that the results obtained using the FT-IR method were by 12-13% lower than those obtained with two other methods. However, the differences observed were within the limits of changeability of results associated with their precision and dependence on reference materials used.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of occupational exposure to dusts containing crystalline silica can be performed on the basis of quantitative analysis of FCS in total dusts using each of the compared methods. The FT-IR method is most appropriate for the FCS determination in samples of small amount of silica or collected at low dust concentrations; the XRD method for the analysis of multicomponent samples; and the chemical method in the case of medium and high FCS contents in samples or high concentrations of dusts in the work environment.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目的是比较和研究使用三种方法对游离结晶二氧化硅(FCS)进行定量分析在评估成分各异的总粉尘样本中粉尘暴露情况时的实用性:波兰常用的化学方法;红外光谱法;以及X射线粉末衍射法。

材料与方法

对9个实验室的原材料、材料和工业废料样本的矿物成分和FCS含量进行了研究,这些样本含有约2%至超过80%的结晶二氧化硅,并被研磨成与总粉尘粒径相当的颗粒。使用XRD和FT-IR方法鉴定样本成分。对粉尘样本分别用三种研究方法进行了10次独立的FCS测定。应用线性相关分析来研究平均FCS测定值之间的相互关系。

结果

在分析的粉尘样本中,除了硅尘外,还有许多矿物在定量分析过程中干扰二氧化硅。FCS测定平均结果的比较表明,使用FT-IR方法获得的结果比使用其他两种方法获得的结果低12 - 13%。然而,观察到的差异在与结果精度及对所用参考物质的依赖性相关的结果变化范围内。

结论

可以使用每种比较方法对总粉尘中的FCS进行定量分析,以此来评估职业性接触含结晶二氧化硅粉尘的情况。FT-IR方法最适用于测定少量二氧化硅样本或低粉尘浓度下采集样本中的FCS;XRD方法适用于分析多组分样本;而化学方法适用于样本中FCS含量中等和较高或工作环境中粉尘浓度较高的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验