Florance V
William H. Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 Apr;80(2):140-9.
Despite technological advances that support wide-ranging access to and transfer of knowledge, practicing physicians continue to underutilize current biomedical literature. This paper explores the nature of clinically applicable medical knowledge through a structural analysis of clinical questions. The author analyzed a set of sixty questions, based on actual online search requests of practicing physicians, for stated and unstated needs, certainty levels, implicit and explicit assumptions, decision-making processes, and type of answer required. As a result, four states of information valuable in patient care were identified: prediagnostic assessment, diagnosis, treatment choice, and learning. These states are presented in frame-like structures that integrate declarative and procedural components of medical decision making. It is concluded that clinical problem solving requires a blend of declarative and procedural knowledge. The ratio depends, in part, upon the reasoning process underway at the time of the request. Procedural knowledge required for clinical problem solving may be absent from current biomedical journal literature or difficult to identify.
尽管技术进步支持广泛获取和传播知识,但执业医师对当前生物医学文献的利用仍然不足。本文通过对临床问题的结构分析,探讨了临床适用医学知识的本质。作者基于执业医师实际的在线搜索请求,分析了一组60个问题,涉及明确和不明确的需求、确定性水平、隐含和明确的假设、决策过程以及所需答案的类型。结果,确定了在患者护理中具有价值的四种信息状态:诊断前评估、诊断、治疗选择和学习。这些状态以框架结构呈现,整合了医学决策的陈述性和程序性成分。得出的结论是,临床问题解决需要陈述性知识和程序性知识的融合。这种比例部分取决于请求时正在进行的推理过程。临床问题解决所需的程序性知识可能在当前生物医学期刊文献中不存在或难以识别。