• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于撰写更具信息量的临床文章摘要的提议。医学文献批判性评价特设工作组。

A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr;106(4):598-604.

PMID:3826959
Abstract

Medical journals are a principal source of new knowledge for clinicians. Unfortunately, articles containing valid and valuable information are often buried among others of less value. Innovations are needed to assist clinicians in finding articles that are both scientifically sound and applicable to their practices. An easily implemented, although partial, solution is for authors of articles that have clinical implications to structure their abstracts so that key aspects of purpose, methods, and results are reported with a partly controlled vocabulary and in a standardized format. This would assist clinical readers to select appropriate articles more quickly, allow more precise computerized literature searches, and facilitate peer review before publication.

摘要

医学期刊是临床医生获取新知识的主要来源。不幸的是,包含有效且有价值信息的文章常常埋没于其他价值较低的文章之中。需要创新手段来帮助临床医生找到既科学合理又适用于其临床实践的文章。一个虽不全面但易于实施的解决办法是,对于有临床意义的文章,作者应构建其摘要,以便用部分受控词汇并以标准化格式报告目的、方法和结果的关键方面。这将有助于临床读者更快地选择合适的文章,实现更精确的计算机化文献检索,并便于在发表前进行同行评审。

相似文献

1
A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.关于撰写更具信息量的临床文章摘要的提议。医学文献批判性评价特设工作组。
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr;106(4):598-604.
2
More informative abstracts revisited.再探更具信息量的摘要。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Jan;33(1):1-9. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569-33.1.1.
3
More informative abstracts revisited.再谈更具信息量的摘要。
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jul 1;113(1):69-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-1-69.
4
Structured abstracts: narrative review.结构化摘要:叙述性综述。
Acta Cir Bras. 2006 Jul-Aug;21(4):263-8. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502006000400014.
5
A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles.关于撰写更具信息量的综述文章摘要的建议。
Ann Intern Med. 1988 Apr;108(4):613-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-4-613.
6
[Structured abstracting of scientific medical publications].[医学科学出版物的结构化摘要]
Przegl Lek. 1995;52(3):105-8.
7
Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract.普通医学期刊对结构式摘要的采用及结构式摘要的格式
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Apr;93(2):237-42.
8
[The impact of the annual scientific meetings of the Israel Society of Rheumatology as measured by publication rates of the abstracts in peer-reviewed journals].[以同行评审期刊上摘要发表率衡量的以色列风湿病学会年度科学会议的影响]
Harefuah. 2004 Apr;143(4):266-9, 319.
9
[The structured summary: a tool for reader and author].[结构化摘要:读者与作者的工具]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990 Dec 1;134(48):2338-43.
10
Structured abstracts and the JMPT.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Feb;15(2):77-82.

引用本文的文献

1
The McMaster Health Information Research Unit: Over a Quarter-Century of Health Informatics Supporting Evidence-Based Medicine.麦克马斯特健康信息研究单位:二十五年多来支持循证医学的健康信息学。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 31;26:e58764. doi: 10.2196/58764.
2
Analysis of Spin in RCTs of Spine Surgery Using ORG-LOC Grading Tool.使用ORG-LOC分级工具对脊柱手术随机对照试验中的旋转情况进行分析。
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Jul 14;56(11):1882-1890. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00697-2. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Grateful Med: Direct access to MEDLINE for health professionals with personal computers.
感恩医学:为使用个人电脑的医疗专业人员提供直接访问MEDLINE的途径。
Inf Serv Use. 2022 Jun 10;42(2):151-160. doi: 10.3233/ISU-220147. eCollection 2022.
4
Dr. Lindberg and scholarly publishing.林德伯格博士与学术出版
Inf Serv Use. 2022 Jun 10;42(2):193-203. doi: 10.3233/ISU-220151. eCollection 2022.
5
Quality of cost evaluations of physician continuous professional development: Systematic review of reporting and methods.医生持续专业发展的成本评估质量:报告和方法的系统评价。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Jun;11(3):156-164. doi: 10.1007/s40037-022-00705-z. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
6
Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration.诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价和Meta分析的期刊及会议摘要的首选报告项目(PRISMA-DTA摘要版):清单、解释及详述
BMJ. 2021 Mar 15;372:n265. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n265.
7
Analysis of the Variability of Abstract Structures in Medical Journals.医学期刊中摘要结构的变异性分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1013-1014. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4428-4.
8
Standards for design and measurement would make clinical research reproducible and usable.标准的设计和测量方法将使临床研究具有可重复性和实用性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2590-2594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708273114.
9
Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: a cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting.随机对照试验摘要的结构格式:对其当前使用情况及其与方法学报告的关联的横断面分析
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0469-3.
10
Improving reports of research by more informative abstracts: a personal reflection.通过更具信息量的摘要改进研究报告:个人反思
J R Soc Med. 2017 Jun;110(6):249-254. doi: 10.1177/0141076817711075.