Suppr超能文献

对于小儿烧伤患者换药,鼻内给予芬太尼与口服吗啡镇痛效果相当:一项随机双盲交叉研究。

Intranasal fentanyl is an equivalent analgesic to oral morphine in paediatric burns patients for dressing changes: a randomised double blind crossover study.

作者信息

Borland M L, Bergesio R, Pascoe E M, Turner S, Woodger S

机构信息

Emergency Department, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, GPO Box D184, Perth, WA 6840, Australia.

出版信息

Burns. 2005 Nov;31(7):831-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jul 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The ideal analgesic agent for burns wound dressings in paediatric patients would be one that is easy to administer, well tolerated, and produces rapid onset of analgesia with a short duration of action and minimal side-effects to allow rapid resumption of activities and oral intake. We compared our current treatment of oral morphine to intranasal fentanyl in an attempt to find an agent closer to the ideal.

METHODS

A randomised double blind two-treatment crossover study comparing intranasal administration of fentanyl (INF) to orally administered morphine (OM). Children with burn injury aged up to 15 years and weighing 10-75 kg were included. Primary end-point was pain scores. Secondary end-points were time to resumption of age-appropriate activities, time to resumption of fluid intake, sedation and cooperation. Routine observations and vital signs were also recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were studied with a median age of 4.5 years (interquartile range 1.8-9.0 years) and a median weight of 18.4 kg (interquartile range 12.9-33.2kg). Mean pain difference scores (OM-INF) ranged from -0.500 (95% CI=-1.653 to 0.653) at baseline to -0.625 (05% CI=-1.863 to 0.613) for a retrospective rating of worst pain experienced during the dressing procedure. All measurements were within a pre-defined range of equivalent efficacy. The median time to resumption of fluid intake was 108 min (range 44-175 min) with OM and 140 min (range 60-210 min) with INF. These differences were not statistically significant. Fewer patients experienced mild side-effects with INF compared to OM (n=5 versus n=10). No patients experienced depressed respirations or oxygen saturations.

SUMMARY

Intranasal fentanyl was shown to be equivalent to oral morphine in the provision of analgesia for burn wound dressing changes in this cohort of paediatric patients. It was concluded that intranasal fentanyl is a suitable analgesic agent for use in paediatric burns dressing changes either by itself or in combination with oral morphine as a top up titratable agent.

摘要

引言

用于小儿烧伤创面敷料的理想镇痛剂应易于给药、耐受性良好,能迅速起效且作用时间短、副作用最小,以便患儿能迅速恢复活动和经口进食。我们比较了目前口服吗啡与鼻内给予芬太尼的治疗方法,试图找到一种更接近理想的药物。

方法

一项随机双盲双治疗交叉研究,比较鼻内给予芬太尼(INF)与口服吗啡(OM)。纳入年龄在15岁及以下、体重10 - 75千克的烧伤患儿。主要终点是疼痛评分。次要终点是恢复适合年龄活动的时间、恢复液体摄入的时间、镇静和合作情况。还记录了常规观察指标和生命体征。

结果

研究了24例患者,中位年龄4.5岁(四分位间距1.8 - 9.0岁),中位体重18.4千克(四分位间距12.9 - 33.2千克)。平均疼痛差异评分(OM - INF)从基线时的 - 0.500(95%CI = - 1.653至0.653)到换药过程中回顾性评定的最严重疼痛时的 - 0.625(95%CI = - 1.863至0.613)。所有测量结果均在等效疗效的预定义范围内。口服吗啡时恢复液体摄入的中位时间为108分钟(范围44 - 175分钟),鼻内给予芬太尼时为140分钟(范围60 - 210分钟)。这些差异无统计学意义。与口服吗啡相比,鼻内给予芬太尼时出现轻度副作用的患者较少(分别为5例和10例)。没有患者出现呼吸抑制或血氧饱和度降低。

总结

在该组小儿患者中,鼻内给予芬太尼在为烧伤创面换药提供镇痛方面与口服吗啡等效。得出结论,鼻内给予芬太尼是一种适用于小儿烧伤换药的镇痛剂,可单独使用或与口服吗啡联合作为追加滴定剂使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验