Suppr超能文献

一项比较鼻内给予芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡用于急诊科儿童急性疼痛管理的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department.

作者信息

Borland Meredith, Jacobs Ian, King Barbara, O'Brien Debra

机构信息

Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Subiaco, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;49(3):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Oct 25.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We compare the efficacy of intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in a pediatric population presenting to an emergency department (ED) with acute long-bone fractures.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial in a tertiary pediatric ED between September 2001 and January 2005. A convenience sample of children aged 7 to 15 years with clinically deformed closed long-bone fractures was included to receive either active intravenous morphine (10 mg/mL) and intranasal placebo or active intranasal concentrated fentanyl (150 microg/mL) and intravenous placebo. Exclusion criteria were narcotic analgesia within 4 hours of arrival, significant head injury, allergy to opiates, nasal blockage, or inability to perform pain scoring. Pain scores were rated by using a 100-mm visual analog scale at 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes. Routine clinical observations and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven children were enrolled (mean age 10.9 years [SD 2.4]). Fractures were radius or ulna 53 (79.1%), humerus 9 (13.4%), tibia or fibula 4 (6.0%), and femur 1 (1.5%). Thirty-four children received intravenous (i.v.) morphine and 33 received intranasal fentanyl. Statistically significant differences in visual analog scale scores were not observed between the 2 treatment arms either preanalgesia or at 5, 10, 20, or 30 minutes postanalgesia (P=.333). At 10 minutes, the difference in mean visual analog scale between the morphine and fentanyl groups was -5 mm (95% confidence interval -16 to 7 mm). Reductions in combined pain scores occurred at 5 minutes (20 mm; P=.000), 10 minutes (4 mm; P=.012), and 20 minutes (8 mm; P=.000) postanalgesia. The mean total INF dose was 1.7 microg/kg, and the mean total i.v. morphine dose was 0.11 mg/kg. There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Intranasal fentanyl delivered as 150 microg/mL at a dose of 1.7 microg/kg was shown to be an effective analgesic in children aged 7 to 15 years presenting to an ED with an acute fracture when compared to intravenous morphine at 0.1 mg/kg.

摘要

研究目的

我们比较了鼻内给予芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡对因急性长骨骨折就诊于急诊科(ED)的儿科患者的疗效。

方法

我们于2001年9月至2005年1月在一家三级儿科急诊科进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验。纳入了7至15岁临床有畸形闭合性长骨骨折的儿童便利样本,以接受活性静脉注射吗啡(10 mg/mL)和鼻内安慰剂,或活性鼻内浓缩芬太尼(150 μg/mL)和静脉注射安慰剂。排除标准为到达后4小时内使用过麻醉性镇痛药、严重头部损伤、对阿片类药物过敏、鼻阻塞或无法进行疼痛评分。在0、5、10、20和30分钟时使用100毫米视觉模拟量表对疼痛评分。记录常规临床观察和不良事件。

结果

67名儿童入组(平均年龄10.9岁[标准差2.4])。骨折部位为桡骨或尺骨53例(79.1%),肱骨9例(13.4%),胫骨或腓骨4例(6.0%),股骨1例(1.5%)。34名儿童接受静脉注射吗啡,33名儿童接受鼻内芬太尼。在镇痛前或镇痛后5、10、20或30分钟,两个治疗组之间在视觉模拟量表评分上未观察到统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.333)。在10分钟时,吗啡组和芬太尼组之间的平均视觉模拟量表差异为 -5 mm(95%置信区间 -16至7 mm)。镇痛后5分钟(20 mm;P = 0.000)、10分钟(4 mm;P = 0.012)和20分钟(8 mm;P = 0.000)时联合疼痛评分降低。芬太尼的平均总剂量为1.7 μg/kg,静脉注射吗啡的平均总剂量为0.11 mg/kg。未发生严重不良事件。

结论

与0.1 mg/kg静脉注射吗啡相比,以150 μg/mL、剂量为1.7 μg/kg给予鼻内芬太尼对因急性骨折就诊于急诊科的7至15岁儿童是一种有效的镇痛药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验