Coletta Claudio, De Marchis Elettra, Lenoli Monica, Rosato Stefano, Renzi Marco, Sestili Augusto, Romano Patrizia, Infusino Tommaso, Ricci Roberto, Ceci Vincenzo
Cardiology Department, S. Spirito Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006 Aug;7(4):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2005.06.003. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
We sought to assess the reliability of some basic echocardiographic data obtained by trained sonographers using a hand-held ultrasound device.
One hundred and twelve consecutive patients (mean age 61, 64 males) referred for in-hospital or ambulatory routine echocardiography were considered. All patients underwent two-dimensional and colour Doppler examination performed by a trained sonographer equipped with a hand-held ultrasound device and by a certified cardiologist equipped with a standard platform, in random order. Indexed left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic transverse diameters, aortic root, end-systolic left atrium transverse diameter, end-diastolic interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness were calculated by two-dimensional left parasternal long-axis view in blind conditions. Mitral and aortic valve regurgitation were investigated by colour-Doppler imaging on parasternal and apical views and compared using a 0 to 4 semi-quantitative score.
Overall feasibility was high for both settings (sonographers: 93%; cardiologists: 95%; P not significant). Excellent concordance of end-diastolic diameter (kappa 0.75), left atrium (kappa 0.76) and interventricular septum thickness (kappa 0.77) results was found. Good concordance was observed for end-systolic diameter (kappa 0.66), aortic root (kappa 0.64) and posterior wall thickness (kappa 0.67) results. A high linear correlation between the couples of results was present for all parameters. A good agreement of the mitral (kappa 0.66) and aortic (kappa 0.84) regurgitation scores was also found, with a low prevalence of discordant results (mitral regurgitation: 22%, aortic regurgitation: 9%) and no > or =2-point discrepancies.
In a general population referred for Doppler echocardiography, basic cardiac linear dimensions and valvular regurgitation severity assessment by trained sonographers using hand-held ultrasound devices appear accurate and reliable for routine clinical use.
我们试图评估经过培训的超声检查医师使用手持式超声设备获取的一些基本超声心动图数据的可靠性。
纳入112例连续接受住院或门诊常规超声心动图检查的患者(平均年龄61岁,男性64例)。所有患者均由配备手持式超声设备的经过培训的超声检查医师和配备标准平台的认证心脏病专家以随机顺序进行二维和彩色多普勒检查。在盲态下通过二维胸骨旁左长轴视图计算左心室舒张末期和收缩末期内径、主动脉根部、收缩末期左心房内径、舒张末期室间隔和后壁厚度。通过胸骨旁和心尖视图的彩色多普勒成像研究二尖瓣和主动脉瓣反流情况,并使用0至4的半定量评分进行比较。
两种检查方式的总体可行性都很高(超声检查医师:93%;心脏病专家:95%;P无统计学意义)。舒张末期内径(kappa 0.75)、左心房(kappa 0.76)和室间隔厚度(kappa 0.77)结果的一致性极佳。收缩末期内径(kappa 0.66)、主动脉根部(kappa 0.64)和后壁厚度(kappa 0.67)结果的一致性良好。所有参数的结果对之间均存在高度线性相关性。二尖瓣(kappa 0.66)和主动脉瓣(kappa 0.84)反流评分的一致性也很好,不一致结果的发生率较低(二尖瓣反流:22%,主动脉瓣反流:9%),且不存在≥2分的差异。
在接受多普勒超声心动图检查的普通人群中,经过培训的超声检查医师使用手持式超声设备对心脏基本线性尺寸和瓣膜反流严重程度的评估在常规临床应用中似乎准确可靠。