Euscher Elizabeth D, Malpica Anais, Deavers Michael T, Silva Elvio G
Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Aug;29(8):1074-8.
Although differential WT-1 expression between ovarian and uterine serous carcinoma has been discussed in the literature, there have been no studies of WT-1 expression in serous carcinomas in the peritoneum with or without concurrent serous carcinoma in an endometrial polyp. This study addresses this issue and includes a small series of uterine and ovarian serous carcinomas for comparison. Nine peritoneal serous carcinomas with coexistent serous carcinoma in an endometrial polyp, 10 peritoneal serous carcinomas without serous carcinoma in an endometrial polyp, 9 uterine serous carcinomas, and 12 ovarian serous carcinomas were stained with antibody to WT-1. Ninety-two percent of ovarian serous carcinomas and 80% of peritoneal serous carcinomas without serous carcinoma involving an endometrial polyp expressed WT-1. In contrast, 12% of peritoneal serous carcinomas with serous carcinoma in an endometrial polyp expressed WT-1 with the serous carcinoma in the endometrial polyp staining concordantly. For uterine serous carcinoma without an endometrial polyp, only 11% expressed WT-1. Peritoneal serous carcinomas without coexistent serous carcinoma in an endometrial polyp have a WT-1 expression pattern similar to ovarian serous carcinoma while peritoneal serous carcinomas with coexistent serous carcinoma in an endometrial polyp have a staining pattern similar to uterine serous carcinoma. The difference in WT-1 expression among serous carcinomas suggests a difference in biology based on the site of origin. Additionally, the difference in WT-1 expression between peritoneal serous carcinomas with and without coexistent serous carcinoma in endometrial polyps suggests that peritoneal serous carcinoma may have different pathogenetic pathways.
尽管文献中已讨论过卵巢浆液性癌与子宫浆液性癌之间WT-1表达的差异,但尚未有关于腹膜浆液性癌中WT-1表达的研究,无论其是否合并子宫内膜息肉中的浆液性癌。本研究解决了这一问题,并纳入了一小系列子宫和卵巢浆液性癌用于比较。对9例合并子宫内膜息肉中浆液性癌的腹膜浆液性癌、10例不合并子宫内膜息肉中浆液性癌的腹膜浆液性癌、9例子宫浆液性癌和12例卵巢浆液性癌进行WT-1抗体染色。92%的卵巢浆液性癌和80%不合并子宫内膜息肉中浆液性癌的腹膜浆液性癌表达WT-1。相比之下,12%合并子宫内膜息肉中浆液性癌的腹膜浆液性癌表达WT-1,且子宫内膜息肉中的浆液性癌染色一致。对于无子宫内膜息肉的子宫浆液性癌,只有11%表达WT-1。不合并子宫内膜息肉中浆液性癌的腹膜浆液性癌具有与卵巢浆液性癌相似的WT-1表达模式,而合并子宫内膜息肉中浆液性癌的腹膜浆液性癌具有与子宫浆液性癌相似的染色模式。浆液性癌之间WT-1表达的差异表明基于起源部位的生物学差异。此外,合并和不合并子宫内膜息肉中浆液性癌的腹膜浆液性癌之间WT-1表达的差异表明腹膜浆液性癌可能具有不同的发病机制途径。