Prencipe Angela, Zelazo Philip David
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G3.
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jul;16(7):501-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01564.x.
The role of perspective taking in affective decision making was studied in children at two ages (3 and 4 years) using a delay-of-gratification paradigm in which children chose between an immediate reward of lower value and a delayed reward of higher value. Half the children chose for themselves (self condition), and half chose for the experimenter (other condition). Three-year-olds chose delayed rewards in the other condition but made impulsive choices in the self condition. Compared with 3-year-olds, 4-year-olds performed better in the self condition and worse in the other condition. Results suggest that 3-year-olds took either a subjective, first-person perspective (for self) or an objective, third-person perspective (for other). Four-year-olds integrated these perspectives, considering a third-person perspective in the self condition and the experimenter's subjective perspective in the other condition (i.e., her desire for immediate gratification). This integration allowed reason to be tempered by emotion, and vice versa.
采用延迟满足范式,对两个年龄段(3岁和4岁)的儿童在情感决策中采取他人视角的作用进行了研究。在该范式中,儿童要在价值较低的即时奖励和价值较高的延迟奖励之间做出选择。一半儿童为自己做选择(自我条件组),另一半为实验者做选择(他人条件组)。3岁儿童在他人条件组中选择延迟奖励,但在自我条件组中做出冲动选择。与3岁儿童相比,4岁儿童在自我条件组中表现更好,在他人条件组中表现更差。结果表明,3岁儿童要么采取主观的第一人称视角(为自己),要么采取客观的第三人称视角(为他人)。4岁儿童整合了这些视角,在自我条件组中考虑第三人称视角,在他人条件组中考虑实验者的主观视角(即她对即时满足的渴望)。这种整合使得理性能够受到情感的调节,反之亦然。