López-Ibor J J
Psychiatric Unit, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Encephale. 1992 Jan;18 Spec No 1:35-9.
Recent biological research in psychiatry has shown strong relationships between disorders apparently very different but sharing some common symptoms (target symptom perspective) or psychopathology (functional psychopathology perspective). The serotonin involvement in a wide range of conditions (such as depressions and other mood disorders, anxiety disorders, suicidal and aggressive behaviours, impulsive control disorders) has been explained through the common link of serotonin deficiency in disorders and behaviours characterized by a poor control of impulses (multi-impulsive disorders). Psychotropic drugs, mainly antidepressants, enhancing the serotonin metabolism have demonstrated a positive therapeutical effect on those conditions. But, the recent description of the so-called Recurrent Brief Depressive Episodes raises the question if those serotonin related conditions could be diagnosed as mood disorders. In fact, during the 70's in a pre DSM III era, all of these disorders had been considered as forms of masked depressions. This perspective raises also the question about what should be considered as primary in the disorders described, the underlying disturbance of impulsivity or the underlying mood disorder.
近期精神病学领域的生物学研究表明,一些看似截然不同但具有某些共同症状(目标症状视角)或精神病理学特征(功能性精神病理学视角)的疾病之间存在着紧密联系。血清素参与了多种病症(如抑郁症和其他情绪障碍、焦虑症、自杀和攻击行为、冲动控制障碍),这可以通过血清素缺乏在以冲动控制不佳为特征的疾病和行为(多冲动性障碍)中的共同联系来解释。主要作为抗抑郁药的精神药物,增强血清素代谢,已被证明对这些病症具有积极的治疗效果。但是,最近对所谓的复发性短暂抑郁发作的描述引发了一个问题,即这些与血清素相关的病症是否可以被诊断为情绪障碍。事实上,在70年代DSM-III之前的时代,所有这些疾病都被视为隐匿性抑郁症的形式。这种观点也引发了一个问题,即在所述疾病中,什么应被视为首要因素,是潜在的冲动性障碍还是潜在的情绪障碍。