Zühlsdorf B, Kampf G, Floss H, Martiny H
Technische Hygiene, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 2005 Sep;61(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.02.019.
In Europe, the evaluation of processing flexible endoscopes in washer-disinfectors (WDs) is performed in compliance with prEN ISO 15883-1 which includes determination of the efficacy of the cleaning process. Recent data suggest that cleaning processes show large differences when the prEN ISO 15883-1 German test model is applied. Hence, we analysed a total of 72 experiments in order to evaluate the test method. Transparent test tubes as test pieces (length 2 m, lumen 2 mm) were contaminated with a mixture of blood and Enterococcus faecium. Three set-ups were used: WD 425 with soft water, WD 425 with hard water and WD 440 with demineralized water. WDs were set to perform the cleaning stage of the programme alone. Seven cleaning agents were used according to the manufacturers' instructions (21 cleaning processes); in addition, three cleaning processes were carried out without a cleaning agent (i.e. with water alone). Each cleaning process was assessed by means of three experiments. Suspensions of test organism had 9.2x10(10) colony-forming units (cfu)/mL E. faecium (mean of 24 processes). Controls (recovery) contained 1.0x10(6) cfu/mL E. faecium (mean of 71 experiments). Mean log(10) reduction factors (RFs) for each process, i.e. the difference in microbial loads on the control and the processed tubes, were calculated. Cleaning processes led to RFs of 0-4.1, but no process led to residual bacterial loads below the limit of detection (1.8l gcfu/mL). Standard deviations for a cleaning process were small (< or =0.6 in 79% of the processes) indicating adequate reproducibility. The test model led to reproducible results and revealed large differences between the individual processes. If a cleaning process is intended to result in a bioburden reduction (i.e. RF> or =4), the control must carry a minimum bioburden of 6.5x10(5) cfu/mL. This was achieved in 58% of the processes. However, controls with a bioburden <6.5x10(5) cfu/mL never yielded a residual bacterial load below the limit of detection. We found that the prEN ISO 15883-1 German test method is suitable to determine the cleaning efficacy in WDs and leads to reproducible and valid results.
在欧洲,对软式内镜在清洗消毒机(WDs)中的处理评估是按照prEN ISO 15883-1进行的,其中包括清洗过程有效性的测定。最近的数据表明,当应用prEN ISO 15883-1德国测试模型时,清洗过程存在很大差异。因此,我们总共分析了72次实验以评估该测试方法。将透明试管作为测试样本(长度2米,管腔2毫米)用血液和粪肠球菌的混合物污染。使用了三种设置:配备软水的WD 425、配备硬水的WD 425和配备去离子水的WD 440。WDs设置为仅执行程序的清洗阶段。根据制造商的说明使用了七种清洗剂(21个清洗过程);此外,进行了三个不使用清洗剂(即仅用水)的清洗过程。每个清洗过程通过三次实验进行评估。测试生物体的悬浮液含有9.2×10¹⁰菌落形成单位(cfu)/mL粪肠球菌(24个过程的平均值)。对照(回收率)含有1.0×10⁶ cfu/mL粪肠球菌(71次实验的平均值)。计算每个过程的平均log₁₀减少因子(RFs),即对照管和处理后管上微生物负荷的差异。清洗过程导致的RFs为0至4.1,但没有一个过程导致残留细菌负荷低于检测限(1.8lgcfu/mL)。一个清洗过程的标准偏差很小(79%的过程中≤0.6),表明具有足够的可重复性。该测试模型产生了可重复的结果,并揭示了各个过程之间的巨大差异。如果一个清洗过程旨在实现生物负荷降低(即RF≥4),对照必须具有至少6.5×10⁵ cfu/mL的生物负荷。这在58%的过程中实现了。然而,生物负荷<6.5×10⁵ cfu/mL的对照从未产生低于检测限的残留细菌负荷。我们发现prEN ISO 15883-1德国测试方法适用于确定WDs中的清洗效果,并产生可重复且有效的结果。