Breysse Patrick N, Williams D'Ann L, Herbstman Julie B, Symons J Morel, Chillrud Steve N, Ross James, Henshaw Shannon, Rees Katherine, Watson Mike, Geyh Alison S
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005 Aug;2(8):400-5. doi: 10.1080/15459620500194286.
This article presents results of asbestos air sampling conducted to assess the exposure to truck drivers working at the World Trade Center site. Sampling consisted of a combination of area and personal monitoring of 49 truck drivers and included optical and electron microscopic analyses. Three sampling periods were conducted: October 1-7, 2001, October 17-26, 2001, and April 13-23, 2002. Area sample locations were selected to estimate airborne concentrations around the perimeter of the site, on top of the pile, and in the pit. Air samples were collected using a 50-mm conductive cowl and a 25-mm mixed cellulose ester filter at flow rates ranging from 0.5-2 L/min. Samples were analyzed using a combination of phase contrast microscopy (PCM) NIOSH method 7400, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) NIOSH method 7402, and the direct method specified under the Asbestos Hazardous Emergency Response Act. Sample times and flow rates were adjusted to prevent overloading while maximizing sample volume. Personal sampling results suggest that asbestos fiber exposures to truck drivers at the site were low. Exposures based on TEM results generally ranged from less than detectable to 0.1 structures per cubic centimeter (s/cm(3)). TEM-based results further indicate that the majority of asbestos fibers were chrysotile and less than 5 microm in length. PCM-based estimates were generally higher than the TEM results. This is likely due to the counting of nonasbestos fibers. This conclusion is supported by the NIOSH 7402 TEM results, which did not detect asbestos fibers longer than 5 micro m. Area sample results were generally less than the personal results (except for the sample collected on top of the rubble pile) and decreased over the course of the cleanup. Our results show low airborne asbestos concentrations and a predominance of short fibers. Given these low concentrations, evidence of short fibers, and the short duration of the exposure (less than 10 months to complete the cleanup), it is likely that truck drivers working at the site are not at an increased risk for asbestos-related disease.
本文介绍了为评估在世贸中心遗址工作的卡车司机的接触情况而进行的石棉空气采样结果。采样包括对49名卡车司机进行的区域和个人监测,并包括光学和电子显微镜分析。共进行了三个采样期:2001年10月1日至7日、2001年10月17日至26日以及2002年4月13日至23日。区域采样点的选择是为了估计场地周边、堆顶和坑内的空气传播浓度。空气样本通过一个50毫米的导电罩和一个25毫米的混合纤维素酯过滤器以0.5至2升/分钟的流速采集。样本采用相衬显微镜(PCM)美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)方法7400、透射电子显微镜(TEM)NIOSH方法7402以及《石棉危险应急反应法》规定的直接方法进行分析。调整采样时间和流速以防止过载,同时使样本量最大化。个人采样结果表明,该场地卡车司机的石棉纤维接触量较低。基于TEM结果的接触量一般在每立方厘米低于可检测水平至0.1个结构(s/cm³)之间。基于TEM的结果还进一步表明,大多数石棉纤维是温石棉,长度小于5微米。基于PCM的估计值一般高于TEM结果。这可能是由于对非石棉纤维的计数。NIOSH 7402 TEM结果支持了这一结论,该结果未检测到长度超过5微米的石棉纤维。区域采样结果一般低于个人结果(除了在碎石堆顶部采集的样本),并且在清理过程中有所下降。我们的结果显示空气传播的石棉浓度较低,且短纤维占主导。鉴于这些低浓度、短纤维的证据以及接触时间较短(清理工作不到10个月完成),在世贸中心遗址工作的卡车司机患石棉相关疾病的风险可能并未增加。