Gottlieb Scott
American Enterprise Institute in Washington, DC, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):938-48. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.938.
How the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) responds to criticism of its drug safety process will determine whether drug safety actually improves. Propping up the Office of Drug Safety with more bureaucratic prominence or adding new requirements to the preapproval process will add to the cost of drug development and not make drugs safer. New information tools can dramatically improve postmarketing surveillance and collection of data on safety. This information could then be used to reach more definitive regulatory conclusions sooner. New incentives will be needed to entice payers and product developers to work on building a broader, more robust system for collecting data on drug safety.
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)如何回应针对其药品安全流程的批评,将决定药品安全是否真的会得到改善。通过给予药品安全办公室更高的官僚地位来扶持它,或者在审批前流程中增加新要求,都会增加药物研发成本,且不会让药品更安全。新的信息工具能够显著改善上市后监测和安全数据收集工作。这些信息随后可用于更快得出更明确的监管结论。将需要新的激励措施来吸引付款方和产品开发商致力于构建一个更广泛、更强大的药品安全数据收集系统。