Suppr超能文献

[社区精神科服务中患者护理的连续性与患者满意度]

[Continuity of patient care and patient satisfaction in a community-based psychiatric service].

作者信息

Møller-Madsen Susanne Maria, Svendsen Jens Meyer, Kjaersgaard Poul

机构信息

Almenpsykiatrisk Afdeling, Holbaek Sygehus, Psykiatrisk Center.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Jun 20;167(25-31):2766-9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate whether the mandated quality standards concerning doctor and team member/patient continuity in treatment had been achieved. Furthermore, we wanted to assess the degree of patient satisfaction with the psychiatric service.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, we chose 319 consecutive treatments over a period of six months and assessed the number of doctor/patient contacts and the number of patient contacts with other team members (nurse, psychologist and social worker). The results were compared to the goals stated in the standards. Patient satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire. 235 patients were asked to participate; 114 (48%) responded.

RESULTS

In all, 2,600 contacts were registered. 2,449 (94.2%) of these were contacts between patients and team. Though the material included 79 cases of admittance to hospital and 14 cases of admittance to day hospital, the continuity of contact (patient/team) remained unbroken in more than 90% of the cases. The responses to the ''satisfaction questionnaires'' were uniformly positive, showing a high degree of satisfaction.

DISCUSSION

If the same team member sees the patient during admissions and ambulatory practice, a high degree of continuity can be achieved. How this can be done when combined with other specialties is a challenge for the future. 75% of those responding to this questionnaire were satisfied or very satisfied within the areas explored. A high level of patient satisfaction is hardly equivalent to a high professional standard, but high patient satisfaction is certainly indicative of good treatment.

摘要

引言

本调查的目的是评估关于医生以及治疗团队成员与患者之间连续性的强制质量标准是否得到了落实。此外,我们还想评估患者对精神科服务的满意程度。

材料与方法

我们回顾性地选取了连续6个月内的319例治疗案例,评估了医生与患者接触的次数以及患者与其他团队成员(护士、心理学家和社会工作者)接触的次数。将结果与标准中规定的目标进行比较。通过问卷调查评估患者满意度。邀请235名患者参与;114名(48%)做出了回应。

结果

总共记录了2600次接触。其中2449次(94.2%)是患者与团队之间的接触。尽管材料中包括79例住院病例和14例日间医院就诊病例,但在90%以上的病例中,接触的连续性(患者/团队)保持未中断。对“满意度调查问卷”的回答一致呈积极态度,显示出高度的满意度。

讨论

如果同一名团队成员在患者住院期间和门诊治疗时都为其诊治,就可以实现高度的连续性。当与其他专科相结合时如何做到这一点是未来面临的一项挑战。在接受调查的人群中,75%的人在所探讨的领域内表示满意或非常满意。患者的高度满意度很难等同于高水平的专业标准,但高患者满意度肯定表明治疗效果良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验