• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢匹罗与头孢他啶治疗尿路感染的比较。

Cefpirome versus ceftazidime in the treatment of urinary tract infections.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Apr;29 Suppl A:95-104. doi: 10.1093/jac/29.suppl_a.95.

DOI:10.1093/jac/29.suppl_a.95
PMID:1601765
Abstract

In an open, randomized multiclinic trial, hospitalized patients with upper or complicated lower urinary tract infections requiring treatment with a parenteral antibiotic were randomized to receive 1 g doses of cefpirome (594 patients) or ceftazidime (303 patients) 12 hourly for at least five days. Cefpirome was considerably more active in vitro than ceftazidime against Gram-positive pathogens isolated from the urine samples. At the early follow-up, 2-15 days after treatment, clinical cure was achieved in 86% and 82% of the patients in the cefpirome and ceftazidime groups respectively. Elimination of the causative pathogen without recurrence or early reinfection was achieved in 87% of the patients in both groups. Drug related adverse events occurred in 8.9% of cefpirome treated patients and in 4.6% of those receiving ceftazidime. No specific type of adverse reaction accounted for this difference. Treatment was discontinued because of adverse events in 2.5% and 1.7% of the patients respectively. Cefpirome was found to be safe and at least as effective as ceftazidime for the treatment of urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients.

摘要

在一项开放性、随机多中心试验中,需要接受胃肠外抗生素治疗的上尿路感染或复杂性下尿路感染住院患者被随机分为两组,一组每12小时接受1克头孢匹罗治疗(594例患者),另一组每12小时接受头孢他啶治疗(303例患者),至少治疗五天。头孢匹罗在体外对从尿液样本中分离出的革兰氏阳性病原体的活性明显高于头孢他啶。在治疗后2至15天的早期随访中,头孢匹罗组和头孢他啶组分别有86%和82%的患者实现了临床治愈。两组中均有87%的患者清除了致病病原体,且无复发或早期再感染情况。接受头孢匹罗治疗的患者中有8.9%发生了与药物相关的不良事件,接受头孢他啶治疗的患者中有4.6%发生了此类事件。这种差异没有特定类型的不良反应可解释。分别有2.5%和1.7%的患者因不良事件而停药。结果发现,对于住院患者的尿路感染治疗,头孢匹罗是安全的,且疗效至少与头孢他啶相当。

相似文献

1
Cefpirome versus ceftazidime in the treatment of urinary tract infections.头孢匹罗与头孢他啶治疗尿路感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Apr;29 Suppl A:95-104. doi: 10.1093/jac/29.suppl_a.95.
2
Comparison of strategies using cefpirome and ceftazidime for empiric treatment of pneumonia in intensive care patients. The Cefpirome Pneumonia Study Group.使用头孢匹罗和头孢他啶策略对重症监护患者肺炎进行经验性治疗的比较。头孢匹罗肺炎研究组。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Jan;42(1):28-36. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.1.28.
3
A randomized, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with vancomycin plus ceftazidime for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections.一项比较头孢托罗培南与万古霉素加头孢他啶治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者的随机双盲试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1;46(5):647-55. doi: 10.1086/526527.
4
Safety and efficacy of cefepime versus ceftazidime in the treatment of severe infections.头孢吡肟与头孢他啶治疗严重感染的安全性和有效性
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2002 Sep;35(3):159-67.
5
[Comparative study of cefpirome and ceftazidime in complicated urinary tract infections].头孢匹罗与头孢他啶治疗复杂性尿路感染的对比研究
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1991 Apr;37(4):447-64.
6
[Effectiveness of cefpirome in the treatment of complicated infections of the upper and lower urinary tracts].头孢匹罗治疗上、下尿路感染复杂性感染的有效性
Antibiot Khimioter. 1996;41(12):30-3.
7
Randomized comparative trial of cefpirome versus ceftazidime in the empirical treatment of suspected bacteraemia or sepsis. Multicentre Study Group.头孢匹罗与头孢他啶用于疑似菌血症或败血症经验性治疗的随机对照试验。多中心研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Oct;42(4):503-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/42.4.503.
8
Cefpirome: efficacy in the treatment of urinary and respiratory tract infections and safety profile.头孢匹罗:治疗泌尿道和呼吸道感染的疗效及安全性概况。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1993;91:41-50.
9
Ceftolozane-tazobactam compared with levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections, including pyelonephritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cUTI).头孢洛扎他唑巴坦与左氧氟沙星治疗包括肾盂肾炎在内的复杂性尿路感染的随机、双盲、3 期试验(ASPECT-cUTI)。
Lancet. 2015 May 16;385(9981):1949-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62220-0. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
10
Meropenem versus ceftazidime in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a randomized, double-blind trial.美罗培南与头孢他啶治疗癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的随机双盲试验
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Nov 1;18(21):3690-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.21.3690.

引用本文的文献

1
Complicated urinary tract infection in adults.成人复杂性尿路感染。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2005 Nov;16(6):349-60. doi: 10.1155/2005/385768.
2
Cefpirome. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in the treatment of severe nosocomial infections and febrile neutropenia.头孢匹罗。关于其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗严重医院感染和发热性中性粒细胞减少症临床疗效的综述。
Drugs. 1997 Jul;54(1):117-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199754010-00013.