Wolff M
Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Jan;42(1):28-36. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.1.28.
In an international, multicenter, open-label, randomized comparative study, adult patients in intensive care units were enrolled to receive cefpirome intravenously at 2 g twice daily or ceftazidime intravenously at 2 g three times daily for the empiric treatment of pneumonia. Randomization was performed after a double stratification according to the investigator's initial choice of monotherapy or combination therapy and then on the basis of the severity of disease. The primary endpoint was the clinical response at the end of treatment in the intent-to-treat population. Data for all patients were reviewed by a blinded observer. Of the 400 enrolled patients, 201 received cefpirome (monotherapy, 56%) and 199 received ceftazidime (monotherapy, 51%). Pneumonia was hospital acquired for 75% of the patients. Clinical failures rates were 34 versus 36% (odds ratio = 0.922; upper bound of 90% confidence interval = 1.301) in the intent-to-treat analysis for cefpirome and ceftazidime, respectively. For the cefpirome and ceftazidime groups, there were 35 versus 30% clinical failures among monotherapy-stratified patients, respectively, and 34 versus 42% clinical failures among combination therapy-stratified patients, respectively. The rates of clinical failures in the per-protocol analysis were 38 and 42%, respectively. In the population of patients evaluable for bacteriologic efficacy, eradication or presumed eradication was obtained for 71% (172 of 241) and 70% (162 of 230) of the pathogens isolated from the patients receiving cefpirome and ceftazidime, respectively. The mortality rates within 2 weeks after the end of treatment were similar (cefpirome group, 31%; ceftazidime group, 26%), as were the percentages of patients with at least one treatment-related adverse event (17 and 19%, respectively). An empiric treatment strategy with cefpirome at 2 g twice daily is equivalent in terms of efficacy and tolerance to ceftazidime at 2 g three times daily for the treatment of pneumonia in patients in intensive care units.
在一项国际多中心、开放标签、随机对照研究中,入选重症监护病房的成年患者,分别接受每日2次静脉注射2g头孢匹罗或每日3次静脉注射2g头孢他啶,用于肺炎的经验性治疗。根据研究者最初选择的单药治疗或联合治疗进行双重分层,然后根据疾病严重程度进行随机分组。主要终点是意向性治疗人群在治疗结束时的临床反应。所有患者的数据由一位盲态观察者进行审查。在400例入选患者中,201例接受头孢匹罗治疗(单药治疗,56%),199例接受头孢他啶治疗(单药治疗,51%)。75%的患者肺炎为医院获得性。在头孢匹罗和头孢他啶的意向性治疗分析中,临床失败率分别为34%和36%(优势比=0.922;90%置信区间上限=1.301)。对于头孢匹罗组和头孢他啶组,单药治疗分层患者的临床失败率分别为35%和30%,联合治疗分层患者的临床失败率分别为34%和42%。符合方案分析中的临床失败率分别为38%和42%。在可评估细菌学疗效的患者人群中,接受头孢匹罗和头孢他啶治疗的患者分离出的病原体,分别有71%(241例中的172例)和70%(230例中的162例)实现了根除或推测根除。治疗结束后2周内的死亡率相似(头孢匹罗组为31%;头孢他啶组为26%),至少发生一次治疗相关不良事件的患者百分比也相似(分别为17%和19%)。对于重症监护病房患者的肺炎治疗,每日2次静脉注射2g头孢匹罗的经验性治疗策略在疗效和耐受性方面与每日3次静脉注射2g头孢他啶相当。