Gilbert Gregg H, Shelton Brent J, Fisher Monica A
Department of Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
J Periodontol. 2005 Jul;76(7):1161-70. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1161.
The objectives of this study were to: 1) test hypotheses that behavioral factors, baseline clinical status, and incident tooth loss are significantly associated with attachment loss incidence (ALI) and 2) quantify the effect of incident tooth loss on conclusions made about ALI.
The Florida Dental Care Study was a prospective study of persons > or =45 years old. In-person interviews and examinations were conducted at baseline and 48 months, with telephone interviews in between.
Of 560 persons with baseline and 48-month examinations, 22% of persons and 1.8% of teeth had ALI. This was highest among persons with no dental visit during follow-up (person-level incidence of 46%; 5.0% tooth-level incidence). Statistically significant covariates in a multivariable regression of ALI were: losing a tooth due to periodontal reasons after baseline, but before the 48-month examination; not receiving a dental cleaning; and baseline factors (worst attachment level of > or =7 mm, not flossing, a molar tooth, current smoker).
A substantial percentage of persons experienced ALI. Baseline attachment level and behavioral factors were significantly associated with ALI. Persons with incident tooth loss were also at increased risk for ALI, and teeth lost during follow-up had worse baseline attachment level. Had these teeth not been lost before the final examination, the ALI estimate could only have been higher. These findings demonstrate that those at greatest risk for ALI are least likely to enter the dental care system, and among those who do, one health outcome (tooth loss) can affect conclusions made about the incidence of another (ALI).
本研究的目的是:1)检验行为因素、基线临床状况和牙齿丧失与附着丧失发生率(ALI)显著相关的假设,以及2)量化牙齿丧失对关于ALI得出的结论的影响。
佛罗里达牙科护理研究是一项针对年龄≥45岁人群的前瞻性研究。在基线和48个月时进行面对面访谈和检查,期间进行电话访谈。
在560名接受基线和48个月检查的人中,22%的人以及1.8%的牙齿出现了ALI。这在随访期间未进行牙科就诊的人群中最高(人群水平发生率为46%;牙齿水平发生率为5.0%)。在ALI的多变量回归中具有统计学意义的协变量为:在基线后但在48个月检查前因牙周原因丧失一颗牙齿;未接受牙齿清洁;以及基线因素(最差附着水平≥7mm、不使用牙线、磨牙、当前吸烟者)。
相当比例的人经历了ALI。基线附着水平和行为因素与ALI显著相关。出现牙齿丧失的人发生ALI的风险也增加,并且随访期间丧失的牙齿基线附着水平更差。如果这些牙齿在最终检查前未丧失,ALI估计值只会更高。这些发现表明,ALI风险最高的人最不可能进入牙科护理系统,而在进入该系统的人中,一种健康结果(牙齿丧失)会影响关于另一种(ALI)发生率得出的结论。