Gilbert Gregg H, Bader James D, Litaker Mark S, Shelton Brent J, Duncan R Paul
Department of Diagnostic Sciences, UAB School of Dentistry, SDB Room 109, 1530 3rd Avenue, South Birmingham, AL 35294-0007, USA.
J Public Health Dent. 2008 Fall;68(4):209-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00069.x.
This study aims to: (a) quantify the incidence of preventive dental services [in-office fluoride application and dental cleaning (prophylaxis)]; (b) determine if these services are effectively targeted to patients with the highest need; and (c) quantify the role of practice characteristics and patient-level factors in service receipt.
A population-based prospective cohort study was conducted with 873 adults who had at least one tooth at baseline, 743 of whom provided 48-month data. In-person interviews and clinical examinations were conducted biennially for 48 months, with 6-monthly telephone interviews in between. Dental records were abstracted afterward, and practices that served participants completed questionnaires. Analysis was limited to persons with at least one dental visit of any type during follow-up (87 percent of the sample).
Only 9 percent of the persons received at least one fluoride application; 75 percent received a dental cleaning. Persons with high need were actually less likely to have received preventive services. In multivariable regression analyses, characteristics of the practice in which the subject received care were very strongly related to fluoride receipt, independent of patient-specific characteristics.
One preventive procedure was common; the other was uncommon. However, practices did not effectively target high-risk patients for either procedure. Instead, both services were typically received by persons with the least need for them. These findings are consistent with the conclusion that practitioners greatly influenced the delivery of fluoride services, with substantial contributions also made by patient-level predisposing and enabling factors for both preventive services.
本研究旨在:(a)量化预防性牙科服务[诊所内氟化物应用和牙齿清洁(预防性治疗)]的发生率;(b)确定这些服务是否有效地针对需求最高的患者;(c)量化执业特征和患者层面因素在接受服务方面的作用。
对873名基线时有至少一颗牙齿的成年人进行了一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,其中743人提供了48个月的数据。在48个月内每两年进行一次面对面访谈和临床检查,期间每六个月进行一次电话访谈。之后提取牙科记录,为参与者提供服务的诊所完成问卷调查。分析仅限于随访期间至少进行过一次任何类型牙科就诊的人(样本的87%)。
只有9%的人接受了至少一次氟化物应用;75%的人接受了牙齿清洁。高需求人群实际接受预防性服务的可能性更低。在多变量回归分析中,受试者接受治疗的诊所特征与氟化物接受情况密切相关,与患者个体特征无关。
一种预防性程序很常见;另一种则不常见。然而,诊所并未有效地将高风险患者作为这两种程序的目标人群。相反,这两种服务通常由最不需要它们的人接受。这些发现与以下结论一致,即从业者对氟化物服务的提供有很大影响,患者层面预先存在的因素和促成这两种预防性服务的因素也有很大贡献。