Srigley John R, Amin Mahul, Boccon-Gibod Liliane, Egevad Lars, Epstein Jonathan I, Humphrey Peter A, Mikuz Gregor, Newling Don, Nilsson Sten, Sakr Wael, Wheeler Thomas M, Montironi Rodolfo
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2005 May(216):8-19. doi: 10.1080/03008880510030914.
An understanding of prognosis in cancer medicine is important for patient care, research and cancer control programs. In prostate cancer, prognostic (predictive) factors are particularly important given the marked heterogeneity of this disease at clinical, morphologic and biomolecular levels. Clinical stage and histologic grade have historically played major roles in defining heterogeneity in prostate cancer. More recently, serum prostate-specific antigen measurement has assumed a significant prognostic role. Over the last two decades there has been an explosion of research into biomarkers, many of which have been purported to have prognostic significance. In this paper we present an overview of the various consensus initiatives that have transpired over the last dozen years. Criteria for evaluating prognostic factors and classifications of predictive factors have emerged that have proven useful and advanced our understanding of the biology of prostate cancer. The results of these consensus initiatives form a foundation on which the current international consultation on prognosis (prediction) in prostate cancer is built. Advances in our understanding of the new and promising prognostic factors will require a more rigorous evidence-based approach to the analysis of published studies. Furthermore, appropriate mathematical models for the analysis of the multiple factors that influence a prognostic system will have to be employed.
了解癌症医学中的预后情况对于患者护理、研究以及癌症控制项目都很重要。在前列腺癌中,鉴于该疾病在临床、形态学和生物分子水平上存在显著的异质性,预后(预测)因素尤为重要。临床分期和组织学分级在历史上一直是定义前列腺癌异质性的主要因素。最近,血清前列腺特异性抗原检测已发挥重要的预后作用。在过去二十年中,对生物标志物的研究呈爆发式增长,其中许多被认为具有预后意义。在本文中,我们概述了过去十二年来出现的各种共识倡议。已经出现了评估预后因素的标准和预测因素的分类,这些已被证明是有用的,并增进了我们对前列腺癌生物学的理解。这些共识倡议的结果构成了当前前列腺癌预后(预测)国际咨询的基础。要进一步了解新的和有前景的预后因素,需要采用更严格的基于证据的方法来分析已发表的研究。此外,必须采用适当的数学模型来分析影响预后系统的多个因素。