• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

示波法血压测量设备与模拟器:重复性测量及不同型号间的差异

Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.

作者信息

Sims A J, Reay C A, Bousfield D R, Menes J A, Murray A

机构信息

Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastlle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

J Med Eng Technol. 2005 May-Jun;29(3):112-8. doi: 10.1080/03091900500067983.

DOI:10.1080/03091900500067983
PMID:16019880
Abstract

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To measure the repeatability and pressure pulse envelope of simulators used for testing oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices; to study the effect of different envelopes on NIBP devices, and to measure the difference between NIBP devices due to different oscillometric algorithms.

METHODS

Three different models of NIBP simulator and 18 different patient monitors with NIBP function were studied. We developed a pressure measurement system (accuracy 0.048?mmHg) to measure the repeatability of simulators. The effect of changing the envelope was measured by using three simulators with one NIBP device. Differences between 18 NIBP devices were measured using one simulator at seven blood pressure settings.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Simulators generate repeatable pressure pulse envelopes (< 0.2 mmHg) but the magnitude and shape depends on the model of simulator. Oscillometric NIBP devices are highly repeatable (< 2 mmHg) when presented with a repeatable pressure pulse envelope, but different devices employ different algorithms and give different results. For a simulated standard blood pressure setting of 120/80 mmHg, estimates of systolic pressure ranged from 112.6 to 126.6 mmHg (sd of 3.0 mmHg), and diastolic pressure ranged from 74.8 to 86.9 mmHg (sd of 3.5 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Simulators and NIBP devices are sufficiently repeatable for clinical use, but further systematic clinical studies are required to better characterize the pressure pulse envelope for different patient groups.

摘要

主要目的

测量用于测试示波法无创血压(NIBP)设备的模拟器的重复性和压力脉搏包络;研究不同包络对NIBP设备的影响,并测量由于不同示波算法导致的NIBP设备之间的差异。

方法

研究了三种不同型号的NIBP模拟器和18种具有NIBP功能的不同患者监护仪。我们开发了一种压力测量系统(精度为0.048 mmHg)来测量模拟器的重复性。通过使用一个NIBP设备搭配三种模拟器来测量改变包络的影响。在七个血压设置下使用一个模拟器测量18种NIBP设备之间的差异。

主要结果

模拟器产生可重复的压力脉搏包络(<0.2 mmHg),但其大小和形状取决于模拟器的型号。当呈现可重复的压力脉搏包络时,示波法NIBP设备具有高度重复性(<2 mmHg),但不同设备采用不同算法并给出不同结果。对于模拟的120/80 mmHg标准血压设置,收缩压估计范围为112.6至126.6 mmHg(标准差为3.0 mmHg),舒张压范围为74.8至86.9 mmHg(标准差为3.5 mmHg)。

结论

模拟器和NIBP设备在临床使用中具有足够的重复性,但需要进一步的系统临床研究来更好地表征不同患者群体的压力脉搏包络。

相似文献

1
Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.示波法血压测量设备与模拟器:重复性测量及不同型号间的差异
J Med Eng Technol. 2005 May-Jun;29(3):112-8. doi: 10.1080/03091900500067983.
2
Low-cost oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors: device repeatability and device differences.低成本示波无创血压监测仪:设备重复性和设备差异
Physiol Meas. 2005 Aug;26(4):441-5. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/4/010. Epub 2005 Apr 21.
3
Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?模拟器能否评估示波法无创血压监测仪之间的系统差异?
Blood Press Monit. 2000 Apr;5(2):81-9.
4
Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.示波脉搏振幅包络线形状及其特征比率对听诊法和示波法血压测量差异的影响。
Blood Press Monit. 2007 Oct;12(5):297-305. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32826fb773.
5
Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.自动血压测量:示波法波形形状是导致示波法与听诊法血压测量结果差异的一个潜在因素。
J Hypertens. 2008 Jan;26(1):35-43. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f06ec7.
6
Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?一种能再生生理波形的模拟器能否评估示波法无创血压测量设备?
Blood Press Monit. 2006 Apr;11(2):63-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000200482.72410.e2.
7
Extracting oscillometric pulses from the cuff pressure: does it affect the pressures determined by oscillometric blood pressure monitors?从袖带压力中提取示波脉搏:这会影响示波血压监测仪测定的压力吗?
Blood Press Monit. 2006 Oct;11(5):269-79. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000217999.04592.7c.
8
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.用于监测透析患者血压的示波测量装置的体外和体内评估。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Oct;22(10):2950-61. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm288. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
9
Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.影响危重症患者示波法血压测量准确性的因素。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):793-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000053650.12025.1A.
10
A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.有无伪差时示波法血压测量一致性的模拟研究
Blood Press Monit. 2000 Apr;5(2):69-79.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of oscillometric-based blood pressure monitoring devices: impact of pulse volume, arrhythmia, and respiratory artifact.基于示波法的血压监测设备的准确性:脉搏容积、心律失常和呼吸伪影的影响。
J Hum Hypertens. 2024 Jan;38(1):45-51. doi: 10.1038/s41371-023-00856-4. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
A convenient method to verify the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitors by the auscultatory method: A smartphone-based app.一种通过听诊法验证示波法血压监测仪准确性的便捷方法:基于智能手机的应用程序。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Feb;21(2):173-180. doi: 10.1111/jch.13460. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
3
A procedure for evaluation of non-invasive blood pressure simulators.
一种评估无创血压模拟器的方法。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Dec;47(12):1221-8. doi: 10.1007/s11517-009-0532-2. Epub 2009 Oct 13.