Suppr超能文献

示波法血压测量设备与模拟器:重复性测量及不同型号间的差异

Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.

作者信息

Sims A J, Reay C A, Bousfield D R, Menes J A, Murray A

机构信息

Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastlle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

J Med Eng Technol. 2005 May-Jun;29(3):112-8. doi: 10.1080/03091900500067983.

Abstract

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To measure the repeatability and pressure pulse envelope of simulators used for testing oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices; to study the effect of different envelopes on NIBP devices, and to measure the difference between NIBP devices due to different oscillometric algorithms.

METHODS

Three different models of NIBP simulator and 18 different patient monitors with NIBP function were studied. We developed a pressure measurement system (accuracy 0.048?mmHg) to measure the repeatability of simulators. The effect of changing the envelope was measured by using three simulators with one NIBP device. Differences between 18 NIBP devices were measured using one simulator at seven blood pressure settings.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Simulators generate repeatable pressure pulse envelopes (< 0.2 mmHg) but the magnitude and shape depends on the model of simulator. Oscillometric NIBP devices are highly repeatable (< 2 mmHg) when presented with a repeatable pressure pulse envelope, but different devices employ different algorithms and give different results. For a simulated standard blood pressure setting of 120/80 mmHg, estimates of systolic pressure ranged from 112.6 to 126.6 mmHg (sd of 3.0 mmHg), and diastolic pressure ranged from 74.8 to 86.9 mmHg (sd of 3.5 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Simulators and NIBP devices are sufficiently repeatable for clinical use, but further systematic clinical studies are required to better characterize the pressure pulse envelope for different patient groups.

摘要

主要目的

测量用于测试示波法无创血压(NIBP)设备的模拟器的重复性和压力脉搏包络;研究不同包络对NIBP设备的影响,并测量由于不同示波算法导致的NIBP设备之间的差异。

方法

研究了三种不同型号的NIBP模拟器和18种具有NIBP功能的不同患者监护仪。我们开发了一种压力测量系统(精度为0.048 mmHg)来测量模拟器的重复性。通过使用一个NIBP设备搭配三种模拟器来测量改变包络的影响。在七个血压设置下使用一个模拟器测量18种NIBP设备之间的差异。

主要结果

模拟器产生可重复的压力脉搏包络(<0.2 mmHg),但其大小和形状取决于模拟器的型号。当呈现可重复的压力脉搏包络时,示波法NIBP设备具有高度重复性(<2 mmHg),但不同设备采用不同算法并给出不同结果。对于模拟的120/80 mmHg标准血压设置,收缩压估计范围为112.6至126.6 mmHg(标准差为3.0 mmHg),舒张压范围为74.8至86.9 mmHg(标准差为3.5 mmHg)。

结论

模拟器和NIBP设备在临床使用中具有足够的重复性,但需要进一步的系统临床研究来更好地表征不同患者群体的压力脉搏包络。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验