Moura Anna Tereza M Soares de, Reichenheim Michael E
Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2005 Jul-Aug;21(4):1124-33. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2005000400014. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
Domestic violence, particularly in childhood, is a growing public health concern. Information on morbidity is mostly underreported due to constraints in case detection. This paper analyzes the frequency of events measured actively by outpatient services as compared to spontaneous reports. Information on violence was assessed for 245 families from April to June 2001 using the Conflict Tactics Scales: Parent-Child Version (CTSPC) and the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Cases referred to the Social Work Department provided the caseload for the active search period (12 months). There was a high prevalence of physical violence in the couple, with serious events occurring in 17.0% of the families. In relation to children, cases of "minor" physical aggression were reported in 46.0% of families and serious cases in 9.9%. The spontaneously identified prevalence was 3.3%. This case study demonstrates the missed opportunities for detection and calls attention to the need to review the approach to domestic violence by health services.
家庭暴力,尤其是童年时期的家庭暴力,日益引起公众对健康问题的关注。由于病例检测存在限制,发病率信息大多未得到充分报告。本文分析了门诊服务主动测量的事件频率与自发报告的频率。2001年4月至6月,使用冲突策略量表:亲子版(CTSPC)和修订后的冲突策略量表(CTS2)对245个家庭的暴力信息进行了评估。转介到社会工作部的案例提供了主动搜索期(12个月)的病例数量。夫妻间身体暴力的发生率很高,17.0%的家庭发生了严重事件。关于儿童,46.0%的家庭报告了“轻微”身体攻击事件,9.9%的家庭报告了严重事件。自发识别的患病率为3.3%。本案例研究表明了检测方面错失的机会,并呼吁关注卫生服务机构审查家庭暴力应对方法的必要性。