• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[巴西东北部城市人口中亲子冲突策略量表(CTSPC)的结构效度研究]

[A study on the construct validity of the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale (CTSPC) in an urban population in Northeast Brazil].

作者信息

Bonfim Camila Barreto, Santos Darci Neves, Menezes Igor Gomes, Reichenheim Michael Eduardo, Barreto Mauricio Lima

机构信息

Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Basílio da Gama s/n, Campus Universitário Canela, Salvador, BA, Brazil.

出版信息

Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Nov;27(11):2215-26. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011001100015.

DOI:10.1590/s0102-311x2011001100015
PMID:22124499
Abstract

The Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale (CTSPC) is one of the most widely used instruments in the world for investigating domestic violence against children, but targeted use has proven inadequate given the phenomenon's complexity. This study focused on the factor structure of CTSPC scales in an urban population in Northeast Brazil. We conducted a cross-sectional study in a cohort of 1,370 children in Salvador, Bahia State. Factor analysis with promax oblique rotation was performed, and the Kuder-Richardson coefficient was calculated. Factor analysis showed a different distribution of items in the factors as compared to the original instrument. Violence showed a gradual profile in each factor. The Kuder-Richardson coefficient was 0.63 for factor 1, 0.59 for factor 2, and 0.42 for factor 3. The items behaved differently from the original instrument, corroborating international studies. These findings support proposing a resizing of the CTSPC.

摘要

亲子冲突策略量表(CTSPC)是世界上用于调查针对儿童家庭暴力的最广泛使用的工具之一,但鉴于该现象的复杂性,其针对性使用已被证明是不够的。本研究聚焦于巴西东北部城市人口中CTSPC量表的因子结构。我们在巴伊亚州萨尔瓦多的1370名儿童队列中进行了一项横断面研究。进行了具有斜交旋转的因子分析,并计算了库德-理查森系数。因子分析表明,与原始工具相比,各因子中的项目分布不同。暴力在每个因子中呈现出逐渐变化的特征。因子1的库德-理查森系数为0.63,因子2为0.59,因子3为0.42。这些项目的表现与原始工具不同,这与国际研究结果一致。这些发现支持对CTSPC进行调整。

相似文献

1
[A study on the construct validity of the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale (CTSPC) in an urban population in Northeast Brazil].[巴西东北部城市人口中亲子冲突策略量表(CTSPC)的结构效度研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Nov;27(11):2215-26. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011001100015.
2
[Portuguese-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTSPC), an instrument used to identify parental violence against children].[《亲子冲突策略量表》(CTSPC)的葡萄牙语跨文化改编,该量表用于识别针对儿童的父母暴力行为]
Cad Saude Publica. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(6):1701-12. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2003000600014. Epub 2004 Mar 3.
3
Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Conflict Tactics Scales: Parent-child Version (CTSPC) used to identify child abuse.用于识别儿童虐待的葡萄牙语版冲突策略量表:亲子版(CTSPC)的心理测量特性。
Cad Saude Publica. 2006 Mar;22(3):503-15. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006000300005. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
4
Assessing psychological and physical abuse from children's perspective: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the picture-based, modularized child-report version of the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale - Revised (CTSPC-R).从儿童视角评估心理和身体虐待:基于图片的、模块化的儿童报告版父母-儿童冲突策略量表修订版(CTSPC-R)的因子结构和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 8;13(10):e0205401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205401. eCollection 2018.
5
[Are we really detecting violence in families of children visiting our health services? The experience of a public health service in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil].[我们真的能在前来我们医疗服务机构就诊的儿童家庭中检测到暴力行为吗?巴西里约热内卢一家公共卫生服务机构的经验]
Cad Saude Publica. 2005 Jul-Aug;21(4):1124-33. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2005000400014. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
6
Adaptation and validation of the parent-child conflict tactics scale for use in Sri Lanka.适用于斯里兰卡的亲子冲突策略量表的改编与验证。
Ceylon Med J. 2005 Mar;50(1):11-4. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v50i1.1582.
7
Identification of child maltreatment with the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales: development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents.使用亲子冲突策略量表识别儿童虐待:美国父母全国样本的编制与心理测量数据
Child Abuse Negl. 1998 Apr;22(4):249-70. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(97)00174-9.
8
PedHITSS: A Screening Tool to Detect Childhood Abuse in Clinical Settings.儿童虐待筛查工具(PedHITSS):一种在临床环境中检测儿童虐待情况的筛查工具。
Fam Med. 2018 Nov;50(10):763-769. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.778329.
9
[Detection of child abuse: missed opportunities in emergency rooms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil].[儿童虐待的检测:巴西里约热内卢急诊室中错失的机会]
Cad Saude Publica. 2008 Dec;24(12):2926-36. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2008001200022.
10
Patterns of domestic violence and alcohol consumption among women and the effectiveness of a brief intervention in a household setting: a protocol study.女性中的家庭暴力与饮酒模式以及家庭环境中简短干预措施的有效性:一项方案研究
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Sep 24;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0236-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Gene - maltreatment interplay in adult ADHD symptoms: main role of a gene-environment correlation effect in a Brazilian population longitudinal study.基因-虐待相互作用与成人注意缺陷多动障碍症状的关系:巴西人群纵向研究中基因-环境相关效应的主要作用
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;29(11):3412-3421. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02589-3. Epub 2024 May 14.
2
Children and adolescents' emotional problems during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.巴西儿童和青少年在 COVID-19 大流行期间的情绪问题。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;32(6):1083-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00787-022-02006-6. Epub 2022 May 27.
3
Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Caregiver's Feeding Styles Questionnaire.
《照顾者喂养风格问卷巴西葡萄牙语版的跨文化调适》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 11;17(16):5814. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165814.
4
The association of intrafamilial violence against children with symptoms of atopic and non-atopic asthma: A cross-sectional study in Salvador, Brazil.家庭内针对儿童的暴力行为与特应性和非特应性哮喘症状的关联:巴西萨尔瓦多的一项横断面研究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Dec;50:244-53. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.05.021. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Cohort Profile: The Ecuador Life (ECUAVIDA) study in Esmeraldas Province, Ecuador.队列简介:厄瓜多尔埃斯梅拉达斯省的厄瓜多尔生活(ECUAVIDA)研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;44(5):1517-27. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu128. Epub 2014 Jul 2.