• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性研究:培训、经济及患者获益情况

A prospective study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: training economic, and patient benefits.

作者信息

Jain P K, Hayden J D, Sedman P C, Royston C M S, O'Boyle C J

机构信息

Division of Upper Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hull HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2005 Aug;19(8):1082-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2170-y. Epub 2005 May 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-004-2170-y
PMID:16021378
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Even though ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ALC) is safe and cost effective, this approach has yet to gain acceptance in the United Kingdom. We report our 5-year experience of ALC with emphasis on its appropriateness for higher surgical training.

METHODS

Between July 1997 and July 2002, patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who met with appropriate criteria underwent ALC. Surgery was performed either by a consultant surgeon or a higher surgical trainee (HST) under direct supervision in our dedicated day surgery unit. Data were recorded prospectively and patients were interviewed postoperatively by an independent researcher.

RESULTS

There were 269 patients (231 female and 38 male) with a median age of 46 years (range 17-76). Conversion to open cholecystectomy was necessary in three cases (1%). Of the patients, 79% (213) were discharged within 8 hours of surgery; 95% (256) were discharged on the same day. Thirteen patients (5%) required overnight admission as inpatients. An HST performed 166 (62%) of the procedures. There was a statistically significant difference in operating time between consultants (41 min) and trainees (47 min, P = 0.001) but no significant difference in clinical outcome or patient satisfaction. The mean procedural cost to the hospital was 768 pound sterling for ALC compared with 1430 pound sterling for an inpatient operation. Of patients, 87% expressed satisfaction with the day case operation.

CONCLUSION

Our results for ALC compare favorably with published series. In addition, we have demonstrated that the operation can be performed safely by HST under direct supervision without compromising operating lists or safety.

摘要

背景

尽管非住院腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ALC)安全且具有成本效益,但这种方法在英国尚未得到广泛认可。我们报告了我们5年的ALC经验,重点强调其在高级外科培训中的适用性。

方法

在1997年7月至2002年7月期间,符合适当标准的有症状胆结石患者接受了ALC。手术由顾问外科医生或高级外科实习生(HST)在我们专门的日间手术单元直接监督下进行。数据进行前瞻性记录,术后由独立研究人员对患者进行访谈。

结果

共有269例患者(231例女性和38例男性),中位年龄为46岁(范围17 - 76岁)。3例(1%)患者需要转为开腹胆囊切除术。其中79%(即213例)的患者在手术后8小时内出院;95%(256例)在同一天出院。13例患者(5%)需要住院过夜。166例(62%)手术由HST完成。顾问医生的手术时间(41分钟)与实习生的手术时间(47分钟,P = 0.001)在统计学上有显著差异,但临床结果或患者满意度无显著差异。医院进行ALC的平均手术成本为768英镑,而住院手术为1430英镑。87%的患者对日间手术表示满意。

结论

我们的ALC结果与已发表的系列研究相比具有优势。此外,我们证明了在直接监督下,HST可以安全地进行该手术,而不会影响手术安排或安全性。

相似文献

1
A prospective study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: training economic, and patient benefits.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性研究:培训、经济及患者获益情况
Surg Endosc. 2005 Aug;19(8):1082-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2170-y. Epub 2005 May 26.
2
Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本效益
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Jun;11(3):182-4.
3
[Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study].[门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术与住院手术同样有效,且从社会角度来看成本更低:一项随机研究]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Dec 15;145(50):2434-9.
4
Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for selected patients?日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术:特定患者的首选治疗方法?
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jan;21(1):70-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0787-0. Epub 2006 Sep 23.
5
Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes.非住院腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果。
JSLS. 2006 Oct-Dec;10(4):473-8.
6
[Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A cohort study of 1,600 consecutive cases].[门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术。对1600例连续病例的队列研究]
Cir Esp. 2013 Mar;91(3):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
7
Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe and cost effective procedure.日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种安全且具有成本效益的手术。
Eur J Surg. 1996 Jan;162(1):43-6.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study assessing the impact of grade of operating surgeon on operative time and 30-day morbidity.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性队列研究,评估手术医生级别对手术时间和30天发病率的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Mar;100(3):178-184. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0171. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
9
Index laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute admissions with cholelithiasis provides excellent training opportunities in emergency general surgery.索引腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊结石症入院患者,为普通外科急症提供了极好的培训机会。
Surgeon. 2010 Jun;8(3):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2009.10.021. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
10
AMBULATORY LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IS SAFE AND COST-EFFECTIVE: a Brazilian single center experience.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全且具有成本效益:巴西单中心经验
Arq Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;53(2):103-7. doi: 10.1590/S0004-28032016000200010.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of recovery assessment of day case and multiday stay patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.日间手术和多日住院接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的术后恢复质量评估
Turk J Surg. 2021 Dec 31;37(4):355-362. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5451. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者选择:一项系统评价
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Apr-Jun;18(2):176-180. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_255_21.
3
Feasibility and cost effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
The learning curve in ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Oct;12(5):320-4. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200210000-00003.
2
The European Working Time Directive and the training of surgeons.
BMJ. 2002 Aug 31;325(7362):S69. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7362.s69a.
3
Transitions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the impact of ambulatory surgery.
Surg Endosc. 2002 Feb;16(2):323-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8114-x. Epub 2001 Nov 12.
4
The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Am J Surg. 2001 Sep;182(3):250-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00699-7.
门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性和成本效益。一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 12;55:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.036. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
'True Day Case' Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a High-Volume Specialist Unit and Review of Factors Contributing to Unexpected Overnight Stay.高容量专科单位的“真正日间手术”腹腔镜胆囊切除术及意外过夜停留相关因素回顾
Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Jul 24;2018:1260358. doi: 10.1155/2018/1260358. eCollection 2018.
5
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study assessing the impact of grade of operating surgeon on operative time and 30-day morbidity.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性队列研究,评估手术医生级别对手术时间和30天发病率的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Mar;100(3):178-184. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0171. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
6
Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with high BMI: Experience from a UK centre.高体重指数患者的日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术:来自英国一家中心的经验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 May;98(5):329-33. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0125.
7
Feasibility and safety of day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-institution 5-year experience of 1140 cases.日间手术腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性与安全性:单机构1140例患者的5年经验
Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2015 Aug;19(3):109-12. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.3.109. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:基于共识会议的指南
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 May;400(4):429-53. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1300-4. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
9
Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Saudi Med J. 2015 Jan;36(1):46-51. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.1.9738.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy inpatient analysis: does the end justify the means?机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的住院患者分析:结果能否证明手段合理?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Dec;18(12):2116-22. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2673-3. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
5
Predictive factors for unanticipated admissions after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术后意外入院的预测因素。
Arch Surg. 2001 Oct;136(10):1150-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.10.1150.
6
Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本效益
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Jun;11(3):182-4.
7
Prospective 5-year audit for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Br J Surg. 2000 Mar;87(3):362-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01383-12.x.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a "true" outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为一种“真正的”门诊手术:130例连续患者的初步经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;3(1):44-9. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80007-9.
9
Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and cost-effective? A model to study transition of care.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否安全且具有成本效益?一种研究护理过渡的模型。
Anesthesiology. 1999 Jun;90(6):1746-55. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00033.
10
Reforming higher specialist training in the United Kingdom--a step along the continuum of medical education.英国高等专科医生培训改革——医学教育连续进程中的一步。
Med Educ. 1999 Jan;33(1):28-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00356.x.