Acute hemodynamic benefits of bi-atrial atrioventricular sequential pacing with the optimal atrioventricular delay.

Doi Atsushi, Takagi Masahiko, Toda Iku, Yoshiyama Minoru, Takeuchi Kazuhide, Yoshikawa Junichi

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 19;46(2):320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.032.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate the acute effects on hemodynamics of bi-atrial (BiA) pacing with the optimal atrioventricular (AV) delays, in comparison with high right atrial (HRA) pacing and coronary sinus (CS) pacing.

BACKGROUND

Bi-atrial pacing has been suggested as one of the alternative therapy for preventing the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). There are, however, few reports on the hemodynamic effects of BiA pacing, and the results that exist are controversial.

METHODS

Twenty patients were paced from HRA, left lateral site of CS, and both sites with the optimal AV delays at 80 and 100 beats/min, in random order. After 5-min pacing, maximal P-wave duration in a 12-lead electrocardiogram, cardiac output (CO), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and the transmitral flow pattern by transthoracic echocardiography were measured.

RESULTS

Compared with HRA and CS pacing, BiA pacing delivered the shortest P-wave duration (HRA: 130 +/- 14 ms, CS: 132 +/- 19 ms, and BiA: 94 +/- 8 ms, respectively, p < 0.001) and the most improvement in CO and PCWP (HRA: 3.63 +/- 0.67 l/min and 9.2 +/- 4.3 mm Hg, CS: 3.71 +/- 0.70 l/min and 8.8 +/- 3.4 mmHg, and BiA: 3.88 +/- 0.63 l/min and 8.0 +/- 3.1 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.01). Bi-atrial pacing also significantly increased the mitral flow time velocity integral and peak A-wave velocity by transthoracic echocardiography, compared with HRA and CS pacing (HRA: 7.6 +/- 1.4 cm and 68.8 +/- 12.2 cm/s, CS: 7.8 +/- 1.4 cm and 70.5 +/- 14.5 cm/s, and BiA: 8.2 +/- 1.2 cm and 76.3 +/- 14.2 cm/s, respectively, p < 0.01). Bi-atrial pacing most significantly decreased the intervals between the atrial pacing spike and the peak of A-wave (HRA: 180 +/- 28 ms, CS: 165 +/- 21 ms, and BiA: 157 +/- 19 ms, respectively, p < 0.01). These improvements in hemodynamics significantly correlated with interatrial conduction delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Bi-atrial pacing made the most significant improvements of hemodynamics. These benefits may be due to the improvements in interatrial conduction delay and atrial dyssynchrony.