Doi A, Takagi M, Toda I, Yoshiyama M, Takeuchi K, Yoshikawa J
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Heart. 2004 Apr;90(4):411-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.014522.
To evaluate the acute effects on haemodynamic variables of biatrial pacing in comparison with high right atrial (HRA) pacing and left lateral atrial pacing.
23 patients were paced from the HRA site, the lateral site of the coronary sinus (CS), and both sites on two fixed atrioventricular delays (100 and 150 ms) during atrioventricular sequential pacing at 80 and 100 beats/min in random order.
After five minute pacing, the maximum P wave duration on a 12 lead ECG, cardiac output, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and the transmitral flow pattern by transthoracic echocardiography were measured.
Biatrial pacing delivered the shortest P wave duration (133 (25) ms, 133 (27) ms, and 96 (15) ms during HRA, CS, and biatrial pacing, respectively; p < 0.001), and the most improvement in cardiac output and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (3.71 (0.93) l/min and 15 (7) mm Hg, 3.79 (0.97) l/min, and 14 (6) mm Hg, and 4.09 (1.01) l/min and 13(6) mm Hg during HRA, CS, and biatrial pacing, respectively; p < 0.01). Biatrial pacing most significantly decreased the intervals between the atrial pacing spike and the peak and end of the atrial filling wave (186 (16) ms and 250 (22) ms, 172 (19) ms and 242 (24) ms, and 153 (15) ms and 227 (23) ms during HRA, CS, and biatrial pacing, respectively; p < 0.001). It also significantly increased the mitral flow time velocity integral and peak atrial filling wave velocity (7.5 (3.4) cm and 63.8 (17.6) cm/s, 7.8 (3.0) cm and 62.4 (16.6) cm/s, and 8.3 (3.4) cm and 67.8 (19.3) cm/s during HRA, CS, and biatrial pacing, respectively; p < 0.05). The improvements in haemodynamic variables were especially remarkable in patients who had a longer interatrial conduction delay.
Biatrial pacing yielded the most significant improvements in haemodynamic variables. These haemodynamic benefits may play a part in reducing intra-atrial pressure and preventing atrial fibrillation.
评估双房起搏与高位右房(HRA)起搏及左房外侧起搏相比,对血流动力学变量的急性影响。
23例患者在80次/分和100次/分的房室顺序起搏过程中,以随机顺序在HRA部位、冠状窦(CS)外侧部位以及两个部位进行双部位起搏,房室延迟固定为100毫秒和150毫秒。
起搏5分钟后,测量12导联心电图上的最大P波时限、心输出量、肺毛细血管楔压以及经胸超声心动图测量的二尖瓣血流模式。
双房起搏产生的P波时限最短(HRA起搏、CS起搏和双房起搏时分别为133(25)毫秒、133(27)毫秒和96(15)毫秒;p<0.001),心输出量和肺毛细血管楔压改善最为明显(HRA起搏、CS起搏和双房起搏时分别为3.71(0.93)升/分和15(7)毫米汞柱、3.79(0.97)升/分和14(6)毫米汞柱、4.09(1.01)升/分和13(6)毫米汞柱;p<0.01)。双房起搏最显著地缩短了心房起搏信号与心房充盈波峰值和终点之间的间期(HRA起搏、CS起搏和双房起搏时分别为186(16)毫秒和250(22)毫秒、172(19)毫秒和242(24)毫秒、153(15)毫秒和227(23)毫秒;p<0.001)。它还显著增加了二尖瓣血流时间速度积分和心房充盈波峰值速度(HRA起搏、CS起搏和双房起搏时分别为7.5(3.4)厘米和63.8(17.6)厘米/秒、7.8(3.0)厘米和62.4(16.6)厘米/秒、8.3(3.4)厘米和67.8(19.3)厘米/秒;p<0.05)。血流动力学变量的改善在房内传导延迟较长的患者中尤为显著。
双房起搏在血流动力学变量方面产生了最显著的改善。这些血流动力学益处可能在降低房内压和预防心房颤动中发挥作用。