Suppr超能文献

社交焦虑和烦躁不安中的注意偏向:共病会产生影响吗?

Attentional biases in social anxiety and dysphoria: does comorbidity make a difference?

作者信息

Grant D M, Beck J Gayle

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Park Hall, University at Buffalo, Suny, NY 14260, USA.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2006;20(4):520-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Jul 14.

Abstract

This study examined whether comorbid symptoms influence the attentional biases associated with social anxiety and dysphoria using the Emotional Stroop Task (EST). Participants were recruited into three groups: a Social Anxiety group, a Dysphoric group, and a Social Anxiety/Dysphoric group. Four types of stimulus words were used: social anxiety threat, depressive threat, neutral words, and positive words. It was hypothesized that the Social Anxiety group would display an attentional bias to emotionally threatening stimuli whereas neither the dysphoric nor the Social Anxiety/Dysphoric group would display an attentional bias. Results found that the Social Anxiety group took longer to color name social threat and depressive words, whereas neither the Dysphoric nor the Comorbid group displayed an attentional bias. These results are discussed in light of their implications for cognitive theories of social anxiety and depression.

摘要

本研究使用情绪斯特鲁普任务(EST)检验了共病症状是否会影响与社交焦虑和烦躁不安相关的注意偏向。参与者被分为三组:社交焦虑组、烦躁不安组和社交焦虑/烦躁不安组。使用了四种类型的刺激词:社交焦虑威胁词、抑郁威胁词、中性词和积极词。研究假设社交焦虑组会对情绪威胁性刺激表现出注意偏向,而烦躁不安组和社交焦虑/烦躁不安组均不会表现出注意偏向。结果发现,社交焦虑组给社交威胁词和抑郁词上色命名的时间更长,而烦躁不安组和共病组均未表现出注意偏向。根据这些结果对社交焦虑和抑郁的认知理论的影响进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验