Mack L A, Temple W J
Department of Surgery/Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Aug;31(6):636-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.02.013.
Surgical quality assurance is a central issue in the treatment of rectal cancer and has led to substantial improvements in sphincter preservation, local control, and overall survival. Education or training as well as volume of practice are often cited as the major predictors of quality outcomes. While volume is a simple measure to analyze, it is likely a superficial or surrogate measure of quality surgery. It has been conclusively demonstrated that education, from total mesorectum excision workshops to nation-wide educational initiatives are effective methods of improving quality of care for the rectal cancer patient. New methods of quality assurance and improvement are being developed including prospective quality registers, the synoptic operative report, and pathology audits. It is imperative that improved measures of quality, other than volume, be implemented to audit our own practices, hospitals and regions with the goal of identifying issues that will improve outcomes for rectal cancer patients.
手术质量保证是直肠癌治疗中的核心问题,已在括约肌保留、局部控制和总生存率方面带来了显著改善。教育或培训以及手术量常被视为质量结果的主要预测指标。虽然手术量是一个便于分析的指标,但它可能只是质量手术的一个表面或替代指标。已经确凿地证明,从全直肠系膜切除研讨会到全国性教育倡议等教育方式,都是提高直肠癌患者护理质量的有效方法。正在开发新的质量保证和改进方法,包括前瞻性质量登记、概要手术报告和病理审核。必须实施除手术量之外的改进质量指标,以审核我们自己的医疗行为、医院和地区,目标是找出能改善直肠癌患者治疗结果的问题。