Schindler Ehrenfried, Kowald Bernd, Suess Heino, Niehaus-Borquez Barbara, Tausch Brigitte, Brecher Annemarie
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepios Klinik Sankt Augustin, German Paediatric Heart Center, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Aug;15(8):677-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01522.x.
In neonates and small children, percutaneous insertion of arterial catheters may be very difficult because of the small diameter of the arteries. Multiple attempts at cannulation are common and may be a predictor of serious adverse events following arterial cannulation. As an end artery, the brachial artery is usually not recommended for cannulation. However, limited data exist about brachial artery catheterization in neonates and young children. In this retrospective study, we report our experience with arterial indwelling catheters placed in neonates and small children prior to surgery for congenital heart defects.
We reviewed 1473 patient medical files containing information about 1574 arterial lines for perioperative and intensive care monitoring. Patient data (age and weight), cannulation characteristics (site, type, percutaneous or cut down insertion), duration of catheterization and complications were documented using the anesthesia and/or intensive care unit files. Patients were divided into three groups according to body weight. Group I: patients with a bodyweight up to 5 kg (n = 561), group II: bodyweight 5-10 kg (n = 615), and group III: bodyweight 10-20 kg (n = 297).
The vast majority of our patients had radial or brachial artery catheterization. In group 1, we placed 200 brachial artery lines. Radial artery insertion was more successful with increasing body weight. Two 'cut downs' were necessary to place the arterial cannula (0.3%). The mean duration of the arterial cannula in place was 5.8 + 4.3 days in group I, which was significantly longer than in group III (2.9 + 2.2 days). Multiple attempts at catheter insertion were required for 200 patients in group I (P < 0.05 compared with groups II and III). The number of guide wires used was similar in all study groups. Generally, we preferred 24 and 22 G catheters for cannulation. Serious complications such as permanent ischemic damage were not observed. Temporary occlusion of an artery occurred in five of 1473 patients. The rate of local infection was 0.5% in group I, 0.7% in group II and 2.3% in group III. Local hematoma were observed more frequently, but with no relevant consequences. Most of our patients were cannulated on the right side. In group I, 112 brachial artery catheters were placed. The greater the weight, the more radial catheters were used compared with a brachial approach. The mean functional time of the catheters (5.8 +/- 4.3 days in group I) was significant shorter compared with patients from group III (2.9 +/- 2.2 days). In 33.3% (n = 200) multiple punctures were needed to place a catheter in group I (P < 0.05 compared with the other groups) whereas the use of a guide wire was evenly distributed throughout the study groups. Small catheters (24 and 22 G) were preferred for most patients. In total only eight 20 G sized catheters were used in the children of group III.
Even considering the nature of a retrospective study design, we conclude that the brachial artery could be considered for cannulation in neonates and small children.
在新生儿和小儿中,由于动脉直径小,经皮插入动脉导管可能非常困难。多次插管尝试很常见,并且可能是动脉插管后严重不良事件的一个预测指标。作为终末动脉,通常不建议对肱动脉进行插管。然而,关于新生儿和幼儿肱动脉插管的数据有限。在这项回顾性研究中,我们报告了我们在先天性心脏病手术前为新生儿和小儿放置动脉留置导管的经验。
我们回顾了1473份患者病历,其中包含1574条用于围手术期和重症监护监测的动脉导管的信息。使用麻醉和/或重症监护病房病历记录患者数据(年龄和体重)、插管特征(部位、类型、经皮或切开插入)以及导管插入持续时间和并发症。根据体重将患者分为三组。第一组:体重达5 kg的患者(n = 561),第二组:体重5 - 10 kg的患者(n = 615),第三组:体重10 - 20 kg的患者(n = 297)。
我们的绝大多数患者进行了桡动脉或肱动脉插管。在第一组中,我们放置了200条肱动脉导管。随着体重增加,桡动脉插管成功率更高。放置动脉套管需要两次“切开”(0.3%)。第一组动脉套管的平均留置时间为5.8 ± 4.3天,明显长于第三组(2.9 ± 2.2天)。第一组中有200例患者需要多次尝试插入导管(与第二组和第三组相比,P < 0.05)。所有研究组使用导丝的数量相似。一般来说,我们更倾向于使用24G和22G导管进行插管。未观察到诸如永久性缺血损伤等严重并发症。1473例患者中有5例发生动脉暂时闭塞。第一组局部感染率为0.5%,第二组为0.7%,第三组为2.3%。局部血肿观察更为频繁,但无相关后果。我们的大多数患者在右侧进行插管。在第一组中,放置了112条肱动脉导管。体重越大,与肱动脉途径相比使用桡动脉导管越多。与第三组患者相比,第一组导管的平均使用时间(5.8 ± 4.3天)明显更短。在第一组中,33.3%(n = 200)的患者放置导管需要多次穿刺(与其他组相比,P < 0.05),而导丝的使用在所有研究组中分布均匀。大多数患者更喜欢使用小导管(24G和22G)。第三组儿童总共仅使用了8条20G尺寸的导管。
即使考虑到回顾性研究设计的性质,我们得出结论,新生儿和小儿可考虑对肱动脉进行插管。