Robbins M K, Gleeson K, Zwillich C W
Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Hershey 17033.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992 Jun;24(6):720-5.
To determine whether supplemental oxygen following exercise hastens recovery or enhances subsequent performance we evaluated its effectiveness in 13 male athletes. The exercise periods consisted of two 5-min submaximal efforts on a treadmill ergometer followed by a single bout to exhaustion. Intervals of exercise were separated by a 4-min recovery period during which the subject breathed either 1) room air, 2) 100% oxygen, or 3) 2 min of 100% oxygen followed by 2 min of room air on three nonconsecutive days. We found that breathing 100% oxygen produced no significant difference on the recovery kinetics of minute ventilation or heart rate, or improvement in subsequent performance as measured by duration of exercise (3.33 +/- 0.04 min, air vs 3.46 +/- 0.03, oxygen) and peak VO2 (59.9 +/- 2.2 ml.kg-1.min-1, air vs 54.5 +/- 2.2, oxygen). In addition, the perceived magnitude of exertion estimated by the Borg scale was no different during oxygen breathing. These findings offer no support for the use of supplemental oxygen in athletic events requiring short intervals of submaximal or maximal exertion.
为了确定运动后补充氧气是否能加速恢复或提高后续运动表现,我们评估了其对13名男性运动员的有效性。运动阶段包括在跑步机测力计上进行两次5分钟的次最大强度运动,然后进行一次直至力竭的运动。运动间隔由4分钟的恢复期隔开,在此期间受试者在三个不连续的日子里分别呼吸:1)室内空气;2)100%氧气;3)先呼吸2分钟100%氧气,然后呼吸2分钟室内空气。我们发现,呼吸100%氧气在分钟通气量或心率的恢复动力学方面没有显著差异,在后续运动表现方面也没有改善,后续运动表现通过运动持续时间(空气组为3.33±0.04分钟,氧气组为3.46±0.03分钟)和峰值摄氧量(空气组为59.9±2.2毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹,氧气组为54.5±2.2)来衡量。此外,在呼吸氧气期间,用Borg量表估计的主观用力程度没有差异。这些发现不支持在需要短时间次最大强度或最大强度运动的体育赛事中使用补充氧气。