Van Diest Ilse, De Peuter Steven, Eertmans Audrey, Bogaerts Katleen, Victoir An, Van den Bergh Omer
Research Group for Stress, Health and Well-being, Department of Psychology, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(8):1835-45. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.031. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
This study aimed to characterize individual bodily symptoms as regards their differential relationship with negative affectivity (NA). In a first step, 73 symptoms were rated by independent groups of raters (psychologists, medical doctors, healthy students) on the following characteristics: the extent to which a symptom (1) refers to a specific location in the body (vagueness), (2) may refer to both a physical condition and a negative emotional state (overlap), and (3) is likely to be a physiological manifestation of anxiety (anxiety). Each symptom was also rated on (4) the probability that it is caused by a clearly defined somatic pathology (somatic pathology), (5) how life-threatening or (6) compromising for the quality of life a symptom is, and (7) how worried one would be if the symptom were to be experienced in daily life (worrying). Two factors, severity and somatic versus psychic, explained 75% of the variance in the ratings on the symptom characteristics. Next, based on the data of 1017 university students (858 women), correlations of each individual symptom with NA were calculated for each gender. The pattern of correlation was highly variable and differed in important ways for men and women. Whereas the correlation of an individual symptom with NA could be predicted by both symptom factors in women (R(2)=52%), only the somatic versus psychic factor was a significant predictor in men (R(2)=11%). These results suggest that (1) NA should not be considered a general complaining factor, and (2) important gender differences exist regarding the type of symptoms that relate most strongly to NA.
本研究旨在描述个体身体症状与消极情感(NA)之间的差异关系。第一步,由独立的评估者小组(心理学家、医生、健康学生)对73种症状在以下特征方面进行评分:症状(1)指向身体特定部位的程度(模糊性)、(2)可能同时指身体状况和消极情绪状态的程度(重叠性)、以及(3)可能是焦虑的生理表现的程度(焦虑性)。每种症状还在以下方面进行评分:(4)由明确界定的躯体病理学引起的可能性(躯体病理学)、(5)症状对生命的威胁程度或(6)对生活质量的损害程度、以及(7)如果在日常生活中出现该症状会有多担心(担忧程度)。严重程度以及躯体与心理这两个因素解释了症状特征评分中75%的方差。接下来,基于1017名大学生(858名女性)的数据,计算了每种性别中每种个体症状与NA的相关性。相关模式高度可变,且在男性和女性中存在重要差异。在女性中,个体症状与NA的相关性可由两个症状因素共同预测(R² = 52%),而在男性中,只有躯体与心理因素是显著的预测因子(R² = 11%)。这些结果表明:(1)不应将NA视为一个普遍的抱怨因素;(2)在与NA相关性最强的症状类型方面存在重要的性别差异。