Vult von Steyern Per, Kokubo Yuji, Nilner Krister
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Swed Dent J. 2005;29(2):53-60.
The aim of the present in-vitro study was to compare the fracture strength of all-ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures supported by tooth-analogues and periodontal membrane with the same supported by dental implants. As ceramics are highly brittle, they cannot withstand deformations of more than 0.1% without fracturing. Hence, when planning an all-ceramic FPD, it is essential to evaluate abutment support, as the fracture strength of all-ceramic constructions depends on the stability of the support to reduce strain in the beam of the prosthesis. The support provided by implants differs, however, from the support provided by natural teeth as the implants are anchored directly in the bone with no intermediate tissue. One question that arises is whether strain and stress in the prosthesis are lower when the prosthesis is loaded on implants compared to natural teeth and hence if all-ceramic FPDs benefit from implant support. Twenty-four three-unit all-ceramic FPDs-12 supported by two dental implants and 12 by two tooth-analogues serving as end abutments-were made. All FPDs were subjected to preloading in a preloading procedure and subsequently subjected to load until fracture occurred. Load at fracture were registered and comparisons between the two groups were made. The loads at fracture were statistically significant higher in the group supported by implants compared to the group supported by tooth-analogues (p = 0.003). Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, the following conclusions can be drawn: All-ceramic fixed partial dentures can be used in combination with dental implants. The solid support gained from implants might thus be beneficial for the outcome of such treatment due to decreased strain and stress levels in the prosthesis when loaded on implants compared to when loaded on natural teeth. Clinical studies are, however, needed to confirm these findings as there are more factors that influence the final clinical outcome.
本体外研究的目的是比较由牙模拟物和牙周膜支持的全瓷固定局部义齿与由牙种植体支持的全瓷固定局部义齿的断裂强度。由于陶瓷非常脆,它们在不发生断裂的情况下无法承受超过0.1%的变形。因此,在设计全瓷固定局部义齿时,评估基牙支持至关重要,因为全瓷结构的断裂强度取决于支持的稳定性,以减少修复体梁中的应变。然而,种植体提供的支持与天然牙提供的支持不同,因为种植体直接锚固在骨中,没有中间组织。出现的一个问题是,与天然牙相比,当修复体加载在种植体上时,修复体中的应变和应力是否更低,因此全瓷固定局部义齿是否受益于种植体支持。制作了24个三单位全瓷固定局部义齿——12个由两个牙种植体支持,12个由两个作为末端基牙的牙模拟物支持。所有固定局部义齿在预加载程序中进行预加载,随后加载直至发生断裂。记录断裂时的载荷,并对两组进行比较。与由牙模拟物支持的组相比,由种植体支持的组的断裂载荷在统计学上显著更高(p = 0.003)。在本体外研究的局限性内,可以得出以下结论:全瓷固定局部义齿可与牙种植体联合使用。与加载在天然牙上相比,加载在种植体上时,种植体提供的坚实支持可能因修复体中应变和应力水平降低而有利于此类治疗的结果。然而,由于有更多因素影响最终临床结果,需要进行临床研究来证实这些发现。