• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于短跨度固定局部义齿的陶瓷种植基台:一项为期5年的前瞻性多中心研究。

Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study.

作者信息

Andersson Bernt, Glauser Roland, Maglione Michele, Taylor Asa

机构信息

SIM/Prosthetic Dentistry, Specialist Dental Service, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset/Mölndal, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):640-6.

PMID:14714845
Abstract

PURPOSE

A prospective, randomized, controlled 5-year multicenter study evaluated the long-term clinical function of CerAdapt ceramic abutments compared to titanium abutments on Brånemark implants supporting short-span fixed partial dentures (FPD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Initially, 105 Brånemark implants were placed in a total of 32 patients at three different clinics; 103 implants remained after initial healing. Fifty-three ceramic and 50 titanium abutments were connected to support 36 FPDs, 19 on ceramic and 17 on titanium abutments.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with 29 FPDs were examined after 5 years. There was a cumulative success rate of 97.2% for FPDs (94.7% for ceramic and 100% for titanium abutment-supported FPDs). One of 53 ceramic and none of 50 titanium abutments failed, giving survival rates of 98.1% and 100%, respectively. There was a mean marginal bone loss of 0.3 mm and 0.4 mm, respectively, for ceramic and titanium abutments. Soft tissues around abutments and adjacent teeth appeared healthy, and no significant differences were recorded for mucosal bleeding and plaque between ceramic and titanium abutments. Crown margins at FPD insertion were positioned as follows: 21% submucosally, 33% at the mucosal margin, and 46% supramucosally. Changes in mucosal level were recorded at 12% of the abutments, with 73% of all changes recorded at ceramic abutments. There was a balance between more or less exposed crown margins during the first 2 years, in contrast to the 2- to 5-year period, when all changes meant less exposed margins.

CONCLUSION

Safe long-term functional and esthetic results can be achieved with CerAdapt alumina ceramic abutments on Brånemark implants for short-span FPDs.

摘要

目的

一项前瞻性、随机、对照的5年多中心研究评估了CerAdapt陶瓷基台与钛基台相比,在支持短跨度固定局部义齿(FPD)的Brånemark种植体上的长期临床功能。

材料与方法

最初,在三个不同诊所的32例患者中共植入105颗Brånemark种植体;初始愈合后剩余103颗种植体。连接53个陶瓷基台和50个钛基台以支持36个FPD,其中19个由陶瓷基台支持,17个由钛基台支持。

结果

5年后对30例患者的29个FPD进行了检查。FPD的累积成功率为97.2%(陶瓷基台支持的FPD为94.7%,钛基台支持的FPD为100%)。53个陶瓷基台中有1个失败,50个钛基台中无一失败,生存率分别为98.1%和100%。陶瓷基台和钛基台的平均边缘骨吸收分别为0.3mm和0.4mm。基台和相邻牙齿周围的软组织看起来健康,陶瓷基台和钛基台之间在黏膜出血和菌斑方面未记录到显著差异。FPD就位时,冠边缘位置如下:21%位于黏膜下,33%位于黏膜边缘,46%位于黏膜上。在12%的基台处记录到黏膜水平变化,所有变化的73%记录在陶瓷基台上。在最初2年内,冠边缘暴露或多或少保持平衡,而在2至5年期间,所有变化均意味着边缘暴露减少。

结论

对于短跨度FPD,在Brånemark种植体上使用CerAdapt氧化铝陶瓷基台可实现安全的长期功能和美学效果。

相似文献

1
Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study.用于短跨度固定局部义齿的陶瓷种植基台:一项为期5年的前瞻性多中心研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):640-6.
2
Ceramic implant abutments used for short-span fixed partial dentures: a prospective 2-year multicenter study.用于短跨度固定局部义齿的陶瓷种植基台:一项为期2年的前瞻性多中心研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Jul-Aug;12(4):318-24.
3
Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study.用于单颗牙齿替换的氧化铝陶瓷种植基台:一项为期1至3年的前瞻性多中心研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Sep-Oct;14(5):432-8.
4
Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years.牙齿和种植体支持的修复体:长达8年的回顾性临床随访
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Nov-Dec;14(6):575-81.
5
All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.全瓷固定局部义齿。基于氧化铝和二氧化锆陶瓷系统的研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2005(173):1-69.
6
Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures.联合牙种植体支持的固定局部义齿的生存率和并发症发生率。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17(5):506-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01259.x.
7
[Clinical evaluation of ceramic and titanium abutment for implant-supported all-ceramic single crown].[种植体支持的全瓷单冠陶瓷基台和钛基台的临床评价]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Jul;42(7):391-4.
8
Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study.种植体支持的固定局部义齿:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):172-6.
9
Two-year prospective follow-up of implant/tooth-supported versus freestanding implant-supported fixed partial dentures.种植体/牙齿支持式与独立种植体支持式固定局部义齿的两年前瞻性随访
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Dec;28(6):593-9.
10
Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.对牙周支持正常和减少的患者中连接牙齿与种植体基台的全牙弓固定局部义齿的回顾性评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Oct;94(4):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Osseo-integration potential of zirconia versus titanium implants.氧化锆与钛种植体的骨结合潜力
Bioinformation. 2025 Feb 28;21(2):161-164. doi: 10.6026/973206300210161. eCollection 2025.
2
Consensus Report by the Italian Academy of Osseointegration on the Importance of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues.意大利骨整合学会关于种植体周围软组织重要性的共识报告。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 26;60(9):1393. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091393.
3
Is There a Better Biomaterial for Dental Implants than Titanium?-A Review and Meta-Study Analysis.
是否存在比钛更好的用于牙种植体的生物材料?——一项综述与荟萃研究分析
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Apr 20;13(2):46. doi: 10.3390/jfb13020046.
4
Enhancement of Gingival Tissue Adherence of Zirconia Implant Posts: In Vitro Study.氧化锆种植体桩牙龈组织附着力的增强:体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 19;14(2):455. doi: 10.3390/ma14020455.
5
Correlation between abutment angulation and off-axial stresses on biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconium implants in the anterior maxilla: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.上颌前部钛和锆植入物生物力学行为中基台角度与离轴应力之间的相关性:一项三维有限元分析研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Oct-Dec;19(4):353-361. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_268_19. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
6
Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.用于固定义齿修复的无金属材料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 20;12(12):CD009606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009606.pub2.
7
Effects of modified abutment characteristics on peri-implant soft tissue health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.改良基台特征对种植体周围软组织健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jan;29(1):118-129. doi: 10.1111/clr.13097. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
8
Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.用于内部三通道和外部六角形种植体连接的氧化锆基台和钛基台的适配精度和扭矩保持力比较。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Aug;9(4):271-277. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.271. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
9
Soft Tissue Response to Titanium Abutments with Different Surface Treatment: Preliminary Histologic Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial.不同表面处理的钛基台的软组织反应:一项随机对照试验的初步组织学报告
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2952530. doi: 10.1155/2016/2952530. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
10
Interaction of titanium, zirconia and lithium disilicate with peri-implant soft tissue: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.钛、氧化锆和二硅酸锂与种植体周围软组织的相互作用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Oct 15;16:467. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0979-4.