Fan Li, Liu Wen-Chao, Zhang Yan-Jun, Ren Jun, Pan Bo-Rong, Liu Du-Hu, Chen Yan, Yu Zhao-Cai
Department of Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul 28;11(28):4300-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i28.4300.
To compare the effect, adverse events, cost-effectiveness and dose intensity (DI) of oral Xeloda vs calcium folinate (CF)/5-FU combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies, both combined with bi-platinu two-way chemotherapy.
A total of 131 patients were enrolled and randomly selected to receive either oral Xeloda (X group) or CF/5-FU (control group). Oral Xeloda 1,000 mg/m2 was administered twice daily from d 1 to 14 in X group, while CF 200 mg/m2 was taken as a 2-h intravenous infusion followed by 5-FU 600 mg/m2 intravenously for 4-6 h on d 1-5 in control group. Cisplatin and oxaliplatin were administered in the same way to both the groups: cisplatin 60-80 mg/m2 by hyperthermic intraperitoneal administration, and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenously for 2 h on d 1. All the drugs were recycled every 21 d, with at least two cycles. Pyridoxine 50 mg was given t.i.d. orally for prophylaxis of the hand-foot syndrome (HFS). Then the effect, adverse events, cost-effectiveness and DI of the two groups were evaluated.
Hundred and fourteen cases (87.0%) finished more than two chemotherapy cycles. The overall response rate of them was 52.5% (X group) and 42.4% (control group) respectively. Tumor progression time (TTP) was 7.35 mo vs 5.95 mo, and 1-year survival rate was 53.1% vs 44.5%. There was a remarkable statistical significance of TTP and 1-year survival between the two groups. The main Xeloda-related adverse events were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, neurotoxicity and HFS, which were mild and well tolerable. Therefore, no patients withdrew from the study due to side effects before two chemotherapy cycles were finished. Both groups finished pre-arranged DI and the relative DI was nearly 1.0. The average cost for 1 patient in one cycle was RMB9 137.35 (X group) and RMB8 961.72 (control group), or USD1 100.89 in X group and USD1 079.73 in control group. To add 1% to the response rate costs RMB161.44 vs RMB210.37 respectively (USD19.45 vs USD25.35). One-month prolongation of TTP costs RMB1 243.18 vs RMB1 506.17 (USD149.78 vs USD181.47). Escalation of 1% of 1-year survival costs RMB172.74 vs RMB201.64 (USD20.75 vs USD24.29).
Oral Xeloda combined with bi-platinu two-way combination chemotherapy is efficient and tolerable for patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies; meanwhile the expenditure is similar to that of CF/5-FU combined with bi-platinu chemotherapy, and will be cheaper if we are concerned about the increase of the response rate, TTP or 1-year-survival rate pharmacoeconomically.
比较口服希罗达与亚叶酸钙(CF)/5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)联合化疗在晚期胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者中的疗效、不良事件、成本效益及剂量强度(DI),二者均联合双铂双向化疗。
共纳入131例患者,随机分为口服希罗达组(X组)和CF/5-FU组(对照组)。X组患者从第1天至第14天每天口服希罗达1000mg/m²,分两次服用;对照组患者在第1至5天,先静脉滴注CF 200mg/m²,持续2小时,随后静脉滴注5-FU 600mg/m²,持续4至6小时。两组患者顺铂和奥沙利铂的给药方式相同:顺铂60 - 80mg/m²通过热腹腔给药,奥沙利铂130mg/m²在第1天静脉滴注2小时。所有药物每21天循环一次,至少进行两个周期。口服维生素B6 50mg,每日三次,预防手足综合征(HFS)。然后评估两组的疗效、不良事件、成本效益及DI。
114例(87.0%)患者完成了两个以上化疗周期。其总体缓解率分别为52.5%(X组)和42.4%(对照组)。肿瘤进展时间(TTP)分别为7.35个月和5.95个月,1年生存率分别为53.1%和44.5%。两组TTP及1年生存率差异有统计学意义。希罗达相关的主要不良事件为骨髓抑制、胃肠道毒性、神经毒性和HFS,程度较轻,耐受性良好。因此,在完成两个化疗周期前,无患者因副作用退出研究。两组均完成了预定的DI,相对DI接近1.0。X组1例患者一个周期的平均费用为9137.35元人民币,对照组为8961.72元人民币;X组为1100.89美元,对照组为1079.73美元。将缓解率提高1%的成本分别为161.44元人民币和210.37元人民币(19.45美元和25.35美元)。TTP延长1个月的成本分别为1243.18元人民币和1506.17元人民币(149.78美元和181.47美元)。1年生存率提高1%的成本分别为172.74元人民币和