Suppr超能文献

放疗与单剂量卡铂辅助治疗Ⅰ期精原细胞瘤的随机试验

Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial.

作者信息

Oliver R T D, Mason M D, Mead G M, von der Maase H, Rustin G J S, Joffe J K, de Wit R, Aass N, Graham J D, Coleman R, Kirk S J, Stenning S P

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, St Bart's and the London Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2005;366(9482):293-300. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66984-X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant radiotherapy is effective treatment for stage I seminoma, but is associated with a risk of late non-germ-cell cancer and cardiovascular events. After good results in initial studies with one injection of carboplatin, we undertook a large randomised trial to compare the approaches of radiotherapy with chemotherapy in seminoma treatment.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2001, 1477 patients from 70 hospitals in 14 countries were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy (para-aortic strip or dog-leg field; n=904) or one injection of carboplatin (n=573; dose based on the formula 7x[glomerular filtration rate+25] mg), at two trial centres in the UK and Belgium. The primary outcome measure was the relapse-free rate, with the trial powered to exclude absolute differences in 2-year rates of more than 3%. Analysis was by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial has been assigned the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN27163214.

FINDINGS

885 and 560 patients received radiotherapy and carboplatin, respectively. With a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR 3.0-4.9), relapse-free survival rates for radiotherapy and carboplatin were similar (96.7% [95% CI 95.3-97.7] vs 97.7% [96.0-98.6] at 2 years; 95.9% [94.4-97.1] vs 94.8% [92.5-96.4] at 3 years, respectively; hazard ratio 1.28 [90% CI 0.85-1.93], p=0.32). At 2 years' follow-up, the absolute differences in relapse-free rates (radiotherapy-chemotherapy) were -1.0% (90% CI -2.5 to 0.5) by direct comparison of proportions, and 0.9% (-0.5 to 3.0) by a hazard-ratio-based approach. Patients given carboplatin were less lethargic and less likely to take time off work than those given radiotherapy. New, second primary testicular germ-cell tumours were reported in ten patients allocated irradiation (all after para-aortic strip field) and two allocated carboplatin (5-year event rate 1.96% [95% CI 1.0-3.8] vs 0.54% [0.1-2.1], p=0.04). One seminoma-related death occurred after radiotherapy and none after carboplatin.

INTERPRETATION

This trial has shown the non-inferiority of carboplatin to radiotherapy in the treatment of stage I seminoma. Although the absence of disease-related deaths and preliminary data indicating fewer second primary testicular germ-cell tumours favour carboplatin use, these findings need to be confirmed beyond 4 years' follow-up.

摘要

背景

辅助放疗是I期精原细胞瘤的有效治疗方法,但与晚期非生殖细胞癌和心血管事件风险相关。在首次注射卡铂的初步研究取得良好结果后,我们开展了一项大型随机试验,比较放疗与化疗在精原细胞瘤治疗中的方法。

方法

1996年至2001年期间,来自14个国家70家医院的1477例患者被随机分配接受放疗(腹主动脉旁条形野或狗腿野;n = 904)或在英国和比利时的两个试验中心接受一次卡铂注射(n = 573;剂量基于公式7×[肾小球滤过率+25]mg)。主要结局指标是无复发生存率,该试验的设计旨在排除两年率的绝对差异超过3%。分析采用意向性分析和符合方案分析。该试验已被分配国际标准随机对照试验编号ISRCTN27163214。

结果

分别有885例和560例患者接受了放疗和卡铂治疗。中位随访4年(四分位间距3.0 - 4.9年),放疗和卡铂的无复发生存率相似(2年时分别为96.7%[95%CI 95.3 - 97.7]和97.7%[96.0 - 98.6];3年时分别为95.9%[94.4 - 97.1]和94.8%[92.5 - 96.4],风险比1.28[90%CI 0.85 - 1.93],p = 0.32)。在2年随访时,通过比例直接比较,无复发生存率的绝对差异(放疗 - 化疗)为 -1.0%(90%CI -2.5至0.5),通过基于风险比的方法为0.9%(-0.5至3.0)。接受卡铂治疗的患者比接受放疗的患者更少出现倦怠,请假时间也更少。在分配接受放疗的10例患者(均在腹主动脉旁条形野放疗后)和分配接受卡铂治疗的2例患者中报告了新的第二原发性睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤(5年事件发生率1.96%[95%CI 1.0 - 3.8]对0.54%[0.1 - 2.1],p = 0.04)。放疗后发生1例与精原细胞瘤相关的死亡,卡铂治疗后无死亡。

解读

该试验表明卡铂在治疗I期精原细胞瘤方面不劣于放疗。尽管没有疾病相关死亡以及初步数据表明第二原发性睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤较少支持使用卡铂,但这些发现需要在4年以上的随访中得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验