• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用OrgAhead(一个计算建模程序)来改善患者护理单元的安全性和质量结果。

Using OrgAhead, a computational modeling program, to improve patient care unit safety and quality outcomes.

作者信息

Effken Judith A, Brewer Barbara B, Patil Anita, Lamb Gerri S, Verran Joyce A, Carley Kathleen

机构信息

University of Arizona College of Nursing, P.O. Box 210203, Tucson, AZ 85721-0203, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.02.003. Epub 2005 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.02.003
PMID:16043085
Abstract

As part of ongoing research to investigate the impact of patient characteristics, organization characteristics and patient unit characteristics on safety and quality outcomes, we used a computational modeling program, OrgAhead, to model patient care units' achievement of patient safety (medication errors and falls) and quality outcomes. We tuned OrgAhead using data we collected from 32 units in 12 hospitals in Arizona. Validation studies demonstrated acceptable levels of correspondence between actual and virtual patient units. In this paper, we report how we used OrgAhead to develop testable hypotheses about the kinds of innovations that nurse managers might realistically implement on their patient care units to improve quality and safety outcomes. Our focus was on unit-level innovations that are likely to be easier for managers to implement. For all but the highest performing unit (for which we encountered a ceiling effect), we were able to generate practical strategies that improved performance of the virtual units that could be implemented by actual units to improve safety and quality outcomes. Nurse managers have responded enthusiastically to the additional decision support for quality improvement.

摘要

作为正在进行的一项研究的一部分,该研究旨在调查患者特征、组织特征和患者护理单元特征对安全和质量结果的影响,我们使用了一个计算建模程序OrgAhead,来模拟患者护理单元在患者安全(用药错误和跌倒)及质量结果方面的达成情况。我们利用从亚利桑那州12家医院的32个护理单元收集的数据对OrgAhead进行了调整。验证研究表明实际患者护理单元与虚拟患者护理单元之间的对应水平可接受。在本文中,我们报告了我们如何使用OrgAhead来提出关于护士长可能切实地在其患者护理单元实施的创新类型的可检验假设,以改善质量和安全结果。我们关注的是单元层面的创新,这类创新可能对管理者来说更容易实施。对于除表现最佳的护理单元(我们在该单元遇到了天花板效应)之外的所有单元,我们都能够制定出切实可行的策略,这些策略能提高虚拟单元的表现,实际单元可予以实施以改善安全和质量结果。护士长们对质量改进方面额外的决策支持反应热烈。

相似文献

1
Using OrgAhead, a computational modeling program, to improve patient care unit safety and quality outcomes.使用OrgAhead(一个计算建模程序)来改善患者护理单元的安全性和质量结果。
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.02.003. Epub 2005 Apr 9.
2
Using computational modeling to improve patient care unit safety and quality outcomes.利用计算模型提高病房护理的安全性和质量效果。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):726-30.
3
Patient safety in hospital acute care units.医院急症护理病房的患者安全
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2006;24:103-25.
4
Simulating nursing unit performance with OrgAhead: strengths and challenges.使用OrgAhead模拟护理单元绩效:优势与挑战。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Nov;30(11):620-6. doi: 10.1097/NXN.0b013e318261f1bb.
5
Managing to improve quality: the relationship between accreditation standards, safety practices, and patient outcomes.致力于提高质量:认证标准、安全实践与患者结局之间的关系。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jul-Sep;34(3):262-72. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181a16bce.
6
Clinical cognition and biomedical informatics: issues of patient safety.临床认知与生物医学信息学:患者安全问题
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Dec;74(11-12):869-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.009. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
7
Using computational modeling to study the impact of workplace characteristics on patient safety outcomes.运用计算模型研究工作场所特征对患者安全结果的影响。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:837.
8
Creating champions for health care quality and safety.打造医疗质量与安全的捍卫者。
Am J Med Qual. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):102-8. doi: 10.1177/1062860609352108. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
9
Safety is part of quality: a proposal for a continuum in performance measurement.安全是质量的一部分:关于绩效衡量连续性的一项提议。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Apr;14(2):354-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00960.x.
10
Measurement of quality and assurance of safety in the critically ill.危重症患者的质量测量与安全保障
Clin Chest Med. 2009 Mar;30(1):169-79, x. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.09.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypothesis generation using network structures on community health center cancer-screening performance.利用网络结构对社区卫生中心癌症筛查绩效进行假设生成。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Oct;57:288-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
2
Virtual patients--what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education.虚拟患者——我们在谈论什么?一个对医疗保健教育中该术语含义进行分类的框架。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Feb 1;15:11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3.
3
Using computational modeling to assess the impact of clinical decision support on cancer screening improvement strategies within the community health centers.
利用计算模型评估临床决策支持对社区卫生中心癌症筛查改善策略的影响。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Oct;51:200-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
4
Simulating nursing unit performance with OrgAhead: strengths and challenges.使用OrgAhead模拟护理单元绩效:优势与挑战。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Nov;30(11):620-6. doi: 10.1097/NXN.0b013e318261f1bb.
5
Virtual patients in pharmacy education.药学教育中的虚拟患者。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Jun 18;76(5):92. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76592.
6
Evidence-based staffing: potential roles for informatics.基于证据的人员配置:信息学的潜在作用。
Nurs Econ. 2008 May-Jun;26(3):151-8, 173.