Kernic Mary A, Monary-Ernsdorff Daphne J, Koepsell Jennifer K, Holt Victoria L
University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Violence Against Women. 2005 Aug;11(8):991-1021. doi: 10.1177/1077801205278042.
Although most states mandate considerations of intimate partner violence (IPV) in child custody proceedings, little is known about how often a preexisting history of IPV is effectively presented to the courts in dissolution cases and, when it is, what effect it has on child custody and visitation outcomes. This retrospective cohort study examined the effects of a history of IPV, further categorized by whether substantiation of that history existed and whether the court handling the custody proceedings knew of that history, on child custody and visitation outcomes. The findings from this study highlight several issues of concern regarding the reality of child custody among families with a history of IPV. These include two primary concerns: a lack of identification of IPV even among cases with a documented, substantiated history, and a lack of strong protections being ordered even among cases in which a history of substantiated IPV is known to exist.
尽管大多数州都规定在子女监护权诉讼中要考虑亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)问题,但对于在离婚案件中,既往的IPV史被有效提交给法庭的频率,以及提交后对子女监护权和探视结果有何影响,人们却知之甚少。这项回顾性队列研究考察了IPV史(进一步根据该历史是否得到证实以及处理监护权诉讼的法庭是否知晓该历史进行分类)对子女监护权和探视结果的影响。该研究的结果凸显了一些与有IPV史家庭的子女监护权实际情况相关的令人担忧的问题。这些问题包括两个主要方面:即使在有记录且得到证实的IPV史的案件中,IPV也未被识别出来;即使在已知存在经证实的IPV史的案件中,也没有下达强有力的保护令。