Kilborne Benjamin
Los Angeles Institute and Society for Psychoanalytic Studies, USA.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2005 Spring;53(2):465-83. doi: 10.1177/00030651050530021601.
Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter has much to teach psychoanalysts and psychotherapists. Perhaps no other American novel lends itself so well to an exploration in depth of the dynamics, conflicts, and defenses characteristic of shame. While most commentators on The Scarlet Letter have assumed Hester Prynne's pain to be shame-based, and the Reverend Dimmesdale's to be guilt-based, a rather different interpretation is proposed namely, that both are afflicted with shame, but that Dimmesdale's is more unbearable than Hester's because more conflictual, less representable, and less easily used protectively. Dimmesdale's shame is at once deeper and more toxic. What "deeper" and "more toxic" mean in the context of shame conflicts (including conflicts to which feelings of shame give rise) is explored.
纳撒尼尔·霍桑的《红字》能给精神分析学家和心理治疗师很多启示。或许没有哪部美国小说比它更适合深入探究羞耻所特有的动力、冲突和防御机制了。虽然大多数《红字》的评论家都认为海丝特·白兰的痛苦基于羞耻,而丁梅斯代尔牧师的痛苦基于内疚,但这里提出一种颇为不同的解读,即两人都饱受羞耻之苦,但丁梅斯代尔的羞耻更难以忍受,因为它更具冲突性、更难以言表,也更不易被用于保护性目的。丁梅斯代尔的羞耻既更深沉又更具毒害性。本文探讨了在羞耻冲突(包括由羞耻感引发的冲突)背景下,“更深沉”和“更具毒害性”意味着什么。