Suppr超能文献

浪子与他的兄弟:公正与利益的平等考量。

The prodigal and his brother: impartiality and the equal consideration of interests.

作者信息

Coghlan Peter

机构信息

Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Australia.

出版信息

Theor Med Bioeth. 2005;26(3):195-206. doi: 10.1007/s11017-005-3978-8.

Abstract

At the heart of Peter Singer's utilitarianism is the impartial weighing of the interests of those affected by our actions. Singer calls this the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests. This paper argues that Singer's Principle does not accord with our moral intuitions and the logic of our moral thinking. It discusses the Principle in the context of the parable of the Prodigal Son and his Brother--a parable that raises the issue of impartiality in a particularly challenging way. What the parable shows is, first, that our moral thinking often turns on judgements of fairness that are prior to any impartial weighing of interests; and, second, that impartial fairness itself is sometimes transcended by compassionate love. Both of these points have important implications for bioethics.

摘要

彼得·辛格的功利主义的核心是公正地权衡受我们行为影响的人的利益。辛格将此称为利益平等考量原则。本文认为,辛格的这一原则不符合我们的道德直觉和道德思维逻辑。文章在浪子与兄长的寓言背景下探讨了这一原则——这个寓言以一种特别具有挑战性的方式提出了公正问题。该寓言首先表明,我们的道德思维常常基于先于任何对利益的公正权衡的公平判断;其次表明,公正的公平有时会被慈悲之爱超越。这两点对生物伦理学都有重要意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验