Coghlan Peter
Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Australia.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2005;26(3):195-206. doi: 10.1007/s11017-005-3978-8.
At the heart of Peter Singer's utilitarianism is the impartial weighing of the interests of those affected by our actions. Singer calls this the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests. This paper argues that Singer's Principle does not accord with our moral intuitions and the logic of our moral thinking. It discusses the Principle in the context of the parable of the Prodigal Son and his Brother--a parable that raises the issue of impartiality in a particularly challenging way. What the parable shows is, first, that our moral thinking often turns on judgements of fairness that are prior to any impartial weighing of interests; and, second, that impartial fairness itself is sometimes transcended by compassionate love. Both of these points have important implications for bioethics.
彼得·辛格的功利主义的核心是公正地权衡受我们行为影响的人的利益。辛格将此称为利益平等考量原则。本文认为,辛格的这一原则不符合我们的道德直觉和道德思维逻辑。文章在浪子与兄长的寓言背景下探讨了这一原则——这个寓言以一种特别具有挑战性的方式提出了公正问题。该寓言首先表明,我们的道德思维常常基于先于任何对利益的公正权衡的公平判断;其次表明,公正的公平有时会被慈悲之爱超越。这两点对生物伦理学都有重要意义。