Carse A L
Philosophy Department, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA.
J Med Philos. 1998 Apr;23(2):153-69. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.2.153.8923.
This essay critically assesses two strategies of accommodation used by defenders of impartialism in ethics to argue that the care orientation represents no genuine challenge to impartialist theoretical paradigms. One strategy focuses on impartiality as a constraint on moral deliberation, the other as a constraint on moral justification. While highlighting respects in which the commitment to impartiality is more consonant with the care orientation than many advocates of care have acknowledged, this essay attempts to clarify crucial ways in which each accommodationist strategy fails, thus locating some of the more important contributions and challenges the care orientation offers to moral theory.
本文批判性地评估了伦理学中公正主义捍卫者用来论证关怀取向对公正主义理论范式不构成真正挑战的两种调和策略。一种策略将公正视为对道德 deliberation 的约束,另一种将其视为对道德 justification 的约束。在强调公正承诺在哪些方面比许多关怀倡导者所承认的更符合关怀取向的同时,本文试图阐明每种调和策略失败的关键方式,从而确定关怀取向对道德理论的一些更重要的贡献和挑战。