Suppr超能文献

多柔比星联合氟尿嘧啶与链脲佐菌素联合氟尿嘧啶或达卡巴嗪治疗晚期类癌肿瘤的II/III期研究:东部肿瘤协作组E1281研究

Phase II/III study of doxorubicin with fluorouracil compared with streptozocin with fluorouracil or dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced carcinoid tumors: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1281.

作者信息

Sun Weijing, Lipsitz Stuart, Catalano Paul, Mailliard James A, Haller Daniel G

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):4897-904. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.616.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Optimal treatments for metastatic carcinoid tumor remain undefined, and the role of chemotherapy for symptomatic patients with progressive disease is uncertain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred forty-nine patients with advanced carcinoid tumors were randomized to either doxorubicin with fluorouracil (FU/DOX) or streptozocin with fluorouracil (FU/STZ). Patients crossed over to the dacarbazine (DTIC) treatment after disease progression following first-line treatment (either FU/DOX or FU/STZ), and 73 patients were assigned to one of these three treatments based on their previous treatment or on abnormal baseline cardiac or renal function.

RESULTS

In the randomized group, there was no difference between FU/DOX and FU/STZ in response rates (15.9% v 16%) and progression-free survival (4.5 v 5.3 months). FU/STZ (24.3 months) was superior to FU/DOX (15.7 months; P = .0267) in median survival. The response rate of crossover DTIC treatment was 8.2%, with a median survival of 11.9 months. Hematologic toxicities were the major treatment-related toxicities for both FU/DOX and FU/STZ, and mild to moderate renal toxicity was reported in 40 (34.8%) of 115 patients in the FU/STZ arm.

CONCLUSION

Response to all three treatment regimens were modest. FU/STZ improved survival compared with the doxorubicin-based regimen, suggesting that the combination should be considered to be an active regimen of therapy when chemotherapy is judged to be an option for selected patients with carcinoid tumors.

摘要

目的

转移性类癌肿瘤的最佳治疗方法尚未明确,化疗对病情进展的有症状患者的作用也不确定。

患者与方法

249例晚期类癌肿瘤患者被随机分为接受阿霉素联合氟尿嘧啶(FU/DOX)或链脲霉素联合氟尿嘧啶(FU/STZ)治疗。一线治疗(FU/DOX或FU/STZ)后疾病进展的患者交叉接受达卡巴嗪(DTIC)治疗,73例患者根据其先前治疗情况或基线心脏或肾功能异常被分配至这三种治疗方法之一。

结果

在随机分组的患者中,FU/DOX和FU/STZ在缓解率(15.9%对16%)和无进展生存期(4.5个月对5.3个月)方面无差异。FU/STZ组的中位生存期(24.3个月)优于FU/DOX组(15.7个月;P = 0.0267)。交叉接受DTIC治疗的缓解率为8.2%,中位生存期为11.9个月。血液学毒性是FU/DOX和FU/STZ两种治疗方法主要的治疗相关毒性,FU/STZ组115例患者中有40例(34.8%)报告有轻度至中度肾毒性。

结论

对所有三种治疗方案的反应均一般。与基于阿霉素的方案相比,FU/STZ改善了生存期,这表明当化疗被认为是某些类癌肿瘤患者的一种选择时,该联合方案应被视为一种有效的治疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验