Moertel C G, Lefkopoulo M, Lipsitz S, Hahn R G, Klaassen D
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. 55905.
N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 20;326(8):519-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202203260804.
The combination of streptozocin and fluorouracil has become the standard therapy for advanced islet-cell carcinoma. However, doxorubicin has also been shown to be active against this type of tumor, as has chlorozotocin, a drug that is structurally similar to streptozocin but less frequently causes vomiting.
In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 105 patients with advanced islet-cell carcinoma to receive one of three treatment regimens: streptozocin plus fluorouracil, streptozocin plus doxorubicin, or chlorozotocin alone. The 31 patients in whom the disease did not respond to treatment were crossed over to chlorozotocin alone or to one of the combination regimens.
Streptozocin plus doxorubicin was superior to streptozocin plus fluorouracil in terms of the rate of tumor regression, measured objectively (69 percent vs. 45 percent, P = 0.05), and the length of time to tumor progression (median, 20 vs. 6.9 months; P = 0.001). Streptozocin plus doxorubicin also had a significant advantage in terms of survival (median, 2.2 vs. 1.4 years; P = 0.004) that was accentuated when we considered long-term survival (greater than 2 years). Chlorozotocin alone produced a 30 percent regression rate, with the length of time to tumor progression and the survival time equivalent to those observed with streptozocin plus fluorouracil. Crossover therapy after the failure of either chlorozotocin alone or one of the combination regimens produced an overall response rate of only 17 percent, and the responses were transient. Toxic reactions to all regimens included vomiting, which was least severe with chlorozotocin; hematologic depression; and, with long-term therapy, renal insufficiency.
The combination of streptozocin and doxorubicin is superior to the current standard regimen of streptozocin plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma. Chlorozotocin alone is similar in efficacy to streptozocin plus fluorouracil, but it produces fewer gastrointestinal side effects than the regimens containing streptozocin. It therefore merits study as a constituent of combination drug regimens.
链脲佐菌素与氟尿嘧啶联合使用已成为晚期胰岛细胞癌的标准治疗方法。然而,阿霉素已被证明对此类肿瘤有活性,氯脲霉素也是如此,该药物在结构上与链脲佐菌素相似,但较少引起呕吐。
在这项多中心试验中,我们将105例晚期胰岛细胞癌患者随机分配接受三种治疗方案之一:链脲佐菌素加氟尿嘧啶、链脲佐菌素加阿霉素或单独使用氯脲霉素。31例对治疗无反应的患者转而单独接受氯脲霉素治疗或接受其中一种联合治疗方案。
在客观测量的肿瘤消退率方面(69%对45%,P = 0.05)以及肿瘤进展时间长度方面(中位数分别为20个月和6.9个月;P = 0.001),链脲佐菌素加阿霉素优于链脲佐菌素加氟尿嘧啶。链脲佐菌素加阿霉素在生存率方面也具有显著优势(中位数分别为2.2年和1.4年;P = 0.004),当我们考虑长期生存(超过2年)时这种优势更加明显。单独使用氯脲霉素产生了30%的消退率,肿瘤进展时间长度和生存时间与链脲佐菌素加氟尿嘧啶所观察到的相当。单独使用氯脲霉素或联合治疗方案之一失败后的交叉治疗产生的总体缓解率仅为17%,且缓解是短暂的。所有治疗方案的毒性反应包括呕吐,氯脲霉素引起的呕吐最轻微;血液学抑制;以及长期治疗时的肾功能不全。
在晚期胰岛细胞癌的治疗中,链脲佐菌素与阿霉素联合使用优于目前链脲佐菌素加氟尿嘧啶的标准治疗方案。单独使用氯脲霉素的疗效与链脲佐菌素加氟尿嘧啶相似,但与含链脲佐菌素的治疗方案相比,其胃肠道副作用较少。因此,它作为联合用药方案的组成部分值得研究。