Zlowodzki Michael, Zelle Boris A, Cole Peter A, Jeray Kyle, McKee Michael D
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55101, USA.
J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Aug;19(7):504-7. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000172287.44278.ef.
Fractures of the clavicle were reported to represent 2.6% of all fractures with an overall incidence of 64 per 100,000 per year (1987, Malmö, Sweden). Midshaft fractures account for approximately 69% to 81% of all clavicle fractures. Treatment options for acute midshaft clavicle fractures include nonoperative treatment (mostly sling or figure-of-eight bandage), open reduction and internal fixation with plates, and closed or open reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary pins, wires, or a nail. Most surgeons prefer nonoperative treatment of nondisplaced midshaft clavicle fractures. However, the optimal treatment option for isolated acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures remains controversial.
This study was designed to systematically summarize and compare results of different treatment options (nonoperative, operative extramedullary fixation, and operative intramedullary fixation) in the management of midshaft clavicle fractures, specifically for displaced fractures.
据报道,锁骨骨折占所有骨折的2.6%,年发病率为每10万人64例(1987年,瑞典马尔默)。中段骨折约占所有锁骨骨折的69%至81%。急性锁骨中段骨折的治疗选择包括非手术治疗(主要是吊带或8字绷带)、钢板切开复位内固定、髓内针、钢丝或髓内钉的闭合或切开复位内固定。大多数外科医生倾向于对无移位的锁骨中段骨折进行非手术治疗。然而,孤立性急性移位锁骨中段骨折的最佳治疗选择仍存在争议。
本研究旨在系统总结和比较不同治疗方法(非手术、手术髓外固定和手术髓内固定)治疗锁骨中段骨折,特别是移位骨折的结果。