Honess P E, Marin C M
Department of Veterinary Services, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(3):390-412. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.003. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
There is considerable interest in the study of stress and aggression in primates as a model for their interpretation in humans. Despite methodological and interpretational problems associated with behavioural and physiological measurement and definition, a considerable body of literature exists on these phenomena in primates. In the course of reviewing this literature we examine examples of many of the sources of variation in stress and aggression, including species identity, sex, age, breeding and social status, individual temperament, background, learning and resource distribution. This is followed by an examination of the interaction between stress and aggression before reviewing the most important areas in which changes in both stress and aggression are measured. In particular we examine those studies covering social aspects of an animal's life, specifically relating to social isolation, crowding as well as group formation, composition and instability. This review reveals the complex and often contradictory nature of relationships, not just between an animal's physiology and its behaviour, but between its stress status and display or receipt of aggression.
将灵长类动物的应激与攻击行为作为人类相关行为的解释模型来研究，受到了广泛关注。尽管在行为和生理测量及定义方面存在方法学和解释上的问题，但关于灵长类动物这些现象的文献颇为丰富。在回顾这些文献的过程中，我们研究了应激和攻击行为诸多变异来源的实例，包括物种特性、性别、年龄、繁殖与社会地位、个体气质、背景、学习及资源分配。接下来，在审视测量应激和攻击行为变化的最重要领域之前，我们先考察应激与攻击行为之间的相互作用。特别地，我们研究那些涵盖动物生活社会层面的研究，具体涉及社会隔离、拥挤以及群体形成、组成和不稳定性。这篇综述揭示了各种关系的复杂性，且往往相互矛盾，不仅体现在动物的生理与行为之间，还体现在其应激状态与攻击行为的表现或接受之间。
