Mellon J Kilian
Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Sep;41(13):2016-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.010.
In 2003, the first of two large NCI-sponsored prostate cancer chemoprevention trials was reported. The prostate cancer prevention trial (PCPT) demonstrated a 24.8% reduction in the prevalence of prostate cancer in men taking finasteride 5mg/d for 7 years. However, despite the overall reduced risk of prostate cancer, men in the finasteride-treated arm of the study were more likely to develop high-grade disease. This article examines some of the controversies aroused by the PCPT and evaluates some of the arguments that have been advanced in an attempt to explain some of the unexpected outcomes of the study. In addition, some of the recent studies assessing the potential impact of an effective chemopreventive strategy on population mortality are reviewed. To conclude, there is some discussion of factors, which need to be openly discussed with male patients who might be considered for finasteride therapy.
2003年,美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)资助的两项大型前列腺癌化学预防试验中的第一项试验结果公布。前列腺癌预防试验(PCPT)表明,服用非那雄胺5毫克/天,持续7年的男性前列腺癌患病率降低了24.8%。然而,尽管总体上前列腺癌风险降低,但该研究中接受非那雄胺治疗组的男性更有可能发展为高级别疾病。本文探讨了PCPT引发的一些争议,并评估了为解释该研究一些意外结果而提出的一些观点。此外,还综述了近期一些评估有效化学预防策略对人群死亡率潜在影响的研究。最后,讨论了一些需要与可能考虑接受非那雄胺治疗的男性患者公开讨论的因素。