Silberman S L, Freeman I, Lester G R
Department of Diagnostic Sciences, University of Mississippi School of Dentistry, Jackson 39216-4505.
J Dent Educ. 1992 Jun;56(6):384-8.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was administered to five classes of students at the beginning and end of their dental education. The 161 students who completed both tests were categorized according to personality type. The Spearman rank-order correlation of the two sets of data was calculated and tested. Changes in personality type between the tests were noted using two different standards. The first standard defined change as any alteration in the four-letter MBTI designation and thus was a measure of change in type. The second standard defined change utilizing the 95 percent confidence interval of the continuous score of each of the four MBTI scales and thus was a measure of change in the underlying construct, personality. The first standard indicated 75.8 percent of students change type; the second indicated 11.2 percent changed personality. These data are consistent with previously reported studies, but raise questions regarding what is being measured and how the data are being analyzed.
在牙科教育开始和结束时,对五个班级的学生进行了迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标测试。完成两次测试的161名学生按照性格类型进行了分类。计算并检验了两组数据的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数。使用两种不同的标准记录了两次测试之间性格类型的变化。第一个标准将变化定义为四个字母的MBTI指标的任何改变,因此是类型变化的一种度量。第二个标准利用四个MBTI量表中每个量表连续得分的95%置信区间来定义变化,因此是潜在结构——性格变化的一种度量。第一个标准表明75.8%的学生改变了类型;第二个标准表明11.2%的学生改变了性格。这些数据与之前报道的研究一致,但引发了关于所测量内容以及数据如何分析的问题。